![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
A friend I sent to the site reported that the formatting broke down when he changed the text size. This is not a problem in IE6, IE5 (Mac), FF or Opera. http://www.stevegibons.com |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Steve Gibons wrote: A friend I sent to the site reported that the formatting broke down when he changed the text size. This is not a problem in IE6, IE5 (Mac), FF or Opera. http://www.stevegibons.com I just checked, and when I change the font size, there are problems. It appears that your layout size is determined by the fonts. In general this is good, and I like it. However since you have a static image in the background - the photo, it is causing a glitch. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Carolyn Marenger wrote: Steve Gibons wrote: A friend I sent to the site reported that the formatting broke down when he changed the text size. This is not a problem in IE6, IE5 (Mac), FF or Opera. http://www.stevegibons.com I just checked, and when I change the font size, there are problems. It appears that your layout size is determined by the fonts. In general this is good, and I like it. However since you have a static image in the background - the photo, it is causing a glitch. Thanks, Carolyn I found a few errors resulting from uncommented lines I thought I had commented, when I moved the site files to the home directory. I think I have it fixed now, except for one thing. You said that the my 1 point white frame actually grows. That's weird. The image is now a background image centered and repeated. I like the effect, though it certainly wouldn't work for every image. Anyway , if you could have another look I'd sure appreciate it. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
In news:44177519.2090902 (AT) gmail (DOT) com, Steve Gibons had this to say: Way way way off topic but I want to add this. That's simply - code, layout, script, etc - ****ing beautiful. I don't see a lot of sites that are - I email owners when I do actually so it's that seldom - beautiful. One thing I want to add, blind people can't navigate. I'm not blind but someone made me think of it... Use JUST your keyboard and navigate to the "Send Email" page. ![]() Galen |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Carolyn Marenger wrote: Steve Gibons wrote: http://www.stevegibons.com That works well. Except for the horizontal scrolling, you mean... ![]() The image now sticks with the frame and it all sizes up and down with the fonts. Not sure what you mean by "sticks with the frame". The background image appears to be initially centered within its container, but it repeats. The edges of the photo don't align like a proper tiling background would. Where the left and right edges of the photo meet (at the tablecloth) looks kinda broken to me. I don't find it especially attractive. :-\ Maybe you don't notice it if you use a smallish text size by default. Zoom text in Firefox/mozilla up a couple notches and you might see what I see by default. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Not sure what you mean by "sticks with the frame". The background image appears to be initially centered within its container, but it repeats. The edges of the photo don't align like a proper tiling background would. Where the left and right edges of the photo meet (at the tablecloth) looks kinda broken to me. I don't find it especially attractive. :-\ that's interesting. To some folks it's broken, some think it's cool. and some don't actually notice it's tiled, and think the photo is growing and shrinking, which would be a nice trick, except in Opera. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am in the category of, it works well with that photo. It took a moment to notice that it was tiled. In my mind that means the photo is a fairly good one for tiling. If the photo had a blue sky, green grass, and a red fire truck on the right hand side - the tiling effect would be glaring and inappropriate. On my screen, the initial sizing came up with an untiled image. When I shrunk the font size, the image zoomed in, effectively cropping the photo. When I zoomed out, it tiled the photo. Since the photo tiled well, it wasn't immediately apparent to me. I did notice it in a couple of seconds, but I felt it was ok. Carolyn |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Galen wrote: In news:44177519.2090902 (AT) gmail (DOT) com, Steve Gibons had this to say: Way way way off topic but I want to add this. That's simply - code, layout, script, etc - ****ing beautiful. I don't see a lot of sites that are - I email owners when I do actually so it's that seldom - beautiful. One thing I want to add, blind people can't navigate. I'm not blind but someone made me think of it... Use JUST your keyboard and navigate to the "Send Email" page. ![]() Galen Thanks! That's great to hear. I couldn't tell if you were saying my site *was* keyboard navigable or should be, in either case, the site is navigable by keyboard in FF, IE, and I tested it a little with the reader called HAL and it's navigable with that. Since a musician's website is an excellent candidate for browsing by a non-sighted person. If anyone out there uses a reader and could let me know if the site does what it ought to, I'd appreciate it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |