HighDots Forums  

Web site critique

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Web site critique in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old   
Neo Geshel
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Web site critique - 05-19-2005 , 10:38 PM






Travis Newbury wrote:
Quote:
Neo Geshel wrote:

The main culprit are the photos themselves. They need to be compressed
more, except I can�t stand the dithering. Damn JPEG. If only Flash
could properly digest PNG. :-(


Import the pngs into a swf then dynamically load the swf(s) in your
slide show flash. When ever we need quality images (or transparency) we
do this.

Hmmm... three identical posts in under 30 seconds... is Thunderbird
stuttering on you? :-)

...Geshel
--
************************************************** ********************
My reply-to is an automatically monitored spam honeypot. Do not use it
unless you want to be blacklisted by SpamCop. Please reply to my first
name at my last name dot org.
************************************************** ********************


Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old   
Neo Geshel
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Web site critique - 05-19-2005 , 10:40 PM






Ben Measures wrote:
Quote:
Neo Geshel wrote:

The main culprit are the photos themselves. They need to be compressed
more, except I can�t stand the dithering. Damn JPEG.

There's something seriously wrong with your application if you're
getting dithering. Dithering is only supposed to be performed when you
reduce the number of colours in the image (don't do this).

If only Flash could properly digest PNG. :-(

Since you're compressing photo-realistic images, you do not want PNG
unless you want lossless compression (perfect quality over filesize).

TTFN,
Sorry, I meant artifacts, not dithering. I hate artifacts. I hate
lowering the image quality just to get an improvement in file size. I
hate dithering, too, but I haven’t created a GIF in almost two years...

...Geshel
--
************************************************** ********************
My reply-to is an automatically monitored spam honeypot. Do not use it
unless you want to be blacklisted by SpamCop. Please reply to my first
name at my last name dot org.
************************************************** ********************


Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old   
Ben Measures
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Web site critique - 05-20-2005 , 08:27 AM



Neo Geshel wrote:
Quote:
Sorry, I meant artifacts, not dithering. I hate artifacts. I hate
lowering the image quality just to get an improvement in file size. I
hate dithering, too, but I haven’t created a GIF in almost two years...
Sometimes, if I need a JPEG to be a certain filesize but can't stand the
quality, a light blurring before saving works wonders (it's certainly
much better than the alternative). Try it, you may be pleased with the
results.

Hth,
--
Ben M.


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.