Update to 'Critique of work in progress'

Thanks to all those that replied originally (in alt.html.critique).

I have put some more effort in and hopefully this one:

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm

is better than

http://smallwww.net/test1/index.htm

But only you good people can say for sure!

Thanks in advance,
John.
Throw the lucky sevens to reply by e-mail.

John Small wrote:

Thanks to all those that replied originally (in alt.html.critique).

I have put some more effort in and hopefully this one:

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm

is better than

http://smallwww.net/test1/index.htm

But only you good people can say for sure!

The second one gives a 404, so yes, first one is definitely
better ;-)

--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

John Small <john (AT) smallw (DOT) de7m7o7n.co.uk> wrote:

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm

I love that background!

It does not belong on your site, however.

Please do try the book that I mentioned before. It is extremely important
that you get a better handle on the use of fonts - you are only holding
yourself back by ignoring it.

The Doormouse

--
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

On Mon, 31 May 2004 17:44:22 +0200, Els wrote:

John Small wrote:

Thanks to all those that replied originally (in alt.html.critique).

I have put some more effort in and hopefully this one:

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm

is better than

BAD url snipped.

But only you good people can say for sure!

The second one gives a 404, so yes, first one is definitely
better ;-)

Apologies, the second address should have been:
http://smallwww.net/test/index.htm

Cheers,
John.

"michael" <no more spam> wrote:

What book is that doormouse?

ISBN 0-89134-651-1

The Doormouse

--
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

What book is that doormouse?

I do think this is better than the last. However, I still think you have a
ways to go before you can claim to be the professional developer compared to
all those others.

Good steps....keep going!

"The Doormouse" <doormouse (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote

John Small <john (AT) smallw (DOT) de7m7o7n.co.uk> wrote:

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm

I love that background!

It does not belong on your site, however.

Please do try the book that I mentioned before. It is extremely important
that you get a better handle on the use of fonts - you are only holding
yourself back by ignoring it.

The Doormouse

--
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

The Doormouse wrote:

"michael" <no more spam> wrote:


What book is that doormouse?


ISBN 0-89134-651-1

You mean "Using Design Basics to Get Creative Results" by Byran L.
Peterson, about $30,00
--
Edwin van der Vaart
http://www.semi-conductor.nl/ Links to Semiconductors sites
http://www.evandervaart.nl/ Under construction

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm
The person that put together this site is clearly NOT a designer; however,

this small detail does not stop him in offering web design to others for a
fee.

This is a venture that's destined to fail.

You've been warned.

--
Pepe
Milano, Italy

Edwin van der Vaart <picayunish2000 (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

You mean "Using Design Basics to Get Creative Results" by Byran L.
Peterson, about $30,00

That's the one!



The Doormouse

--
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

In message <pan.2004.05.31.15.40.36.257271 (AT) smallw (DOT) de7m7o7n.co.uk>, John
Small <john (AT) smallw (DOT) de7m7o7n.co.uk> writes

Thanks to all those that replied originally (in alt.html.critique).

I have put some more effort in and hopefully this one:

http://smallwww.net/test2/index.htm

is better than

http://smallwww.net/test1/index.htm

But only you good people can say for sure!

Thanks in advance,
John.
Throw the lucky sevens to reply by e-mail.

It looks OK and sounds OK; the mark-up also seems OK; seems to be a very
'accessible' site.

There's some typos that need to be sorted out. Examples:

consult.htm: [i.e.] --> [e.g.]
testing.htm [WIA] --> [WAI]

It's always better to get someone else to look for them ;-)

You have a number of items marked up as <ACRONYM></ACRONYM>. Although
they generate a tool-tip in IE, the characteristic 'dotted-underline' is
missing in IE. You may want to expressly style the underline in your
CSS.


regards.
--
Jake