Uncritiqueable web site?

Anyone know of a web site that you guys on ahc cannot critique because
it's prefect?

john henry bonham wrote:

Anyone know of a web site that you guys on ahc cannot critique because
it's prefect?

What a bloody stupid question.

No web site is perfect. They all suck in some fashion.

--
Cheers
Richard.

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:50:24 +0100, john henry bonham <with (AT) he (DOT) ld> wrote:

Anyone know of a web site that you guys on ahc cannot critique because
it's prefect?

Doubtful. "Perfect" is an ideal which likely cannot be attained. The best
pages compromise in the least offensive manner to make them as perfect as
is reasonable. But I doubt I'll ever see a page which cannot be improved
in some way.

Neal wrote:

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:50:24 +0100, john henry bonham <with (AT) he (DOT) ld> wrote:

Anyone know of a web site that you guys on ahc cannot critique because
it's prefect?


Doubtful. "Perfect" is an ideal which likely cannot be attained. The
best pages compromise in the least offensive manner to make them as
perfect as is reasonable. But I doubt I'll ever see a page which cannot
be improved in some way.

Links please? I'd like to take a look.

In message <41668d10$0$94919$5a6aecb4 (AT) news (DOT) aaisp.net.uk>, john henry
bonham <with (AT) he (DOT) ld> writes

Anyone know of a web site that you guys on ahc cannot critique because
it's prefect?

Uh ... no.

That's because everyone has their own idea of 'perfection'.

A site may have 'perfect' mark-up -- but not the graphical design.

A site may have a universally acceptable visual appearance (not likely,
though) -- but bad mark-up.

Then throw in people's pet hates (frames, tables-for-layout, etc.).

And a dash of usability and accessibility requirements.

So ...... no.

regards.


--
Jake

jake wrote:

In message <41668d10$0$94919$5a6aecb4 (AT) news (DOT) aaisp.net.uk>, john henry
bonham <with (AT) he (DOT) ld> writes

Anyone know of a web site that you guys on ahc cannot critique because
it's prefect?


Uh ... no.

That's because everyone has their own idea of 'perfection'.

A site may have 'perfect' mark-up -- but not the graphical design.

A site may have a universally acceptable visual appearance (not likely,
though) -- but bad mark-up.

Then throw in people's pet hates (frames, tables-for-layout, etc.).

And a dash of usability and accessibility requirements.

So ...... no.

regards.

Any web sites thaty come close to fitting most of the pegs into all
those holes?