Review my site, sigh

I hope you will be gentle, at least I have it validated.

There are a few links that aren't correct, but I'm working on those.

I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
group?)

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

Thanks

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

Always More Questions <thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

The HTML is fine. Now go to one of the deisgn groups and they'll critique
the design ....

One note, though - by including the CSS inline you have eliminated one of
the main benefits of CSS, which is linking.

The Doormouse

--
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.

Quoth the raven Always More Questions:

I hope you will be gentle, at least I have it validated.

There are a few links that aren't correct, but I'm working on
those.

You should get your facts correct. You say:

"The Yankees are baseball's most dominant team at every position. They
have won a record 22 World Series and 33 AL pennants..."

The Yanks have won 26 World Series and 39 AL pennants.

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.
http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

Is this your only page? All the links seem to lead to other sites. If
so, ok. If not, move your CSS into a separate file and link to it.

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
<thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

Great you're using CSS, but I'm sorry, have to take a pass. I'm a devout
Red Sox fan, I'm sure you understand. I kinda get sick.

Have fun, all.

In article <Xns95603ACB51F64doormouseattnet (AT) 68 (DOT) 12.19.6>,
The Doormouse <doormouse (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote:

Always More Questions <thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

The HTML is fine. Now go to one of the deisgn groups and they'll critique
the design ....

One note, though - by including the CSS inline you have eliminated one of
the main benefits of CSS, which is linking.

The Doormouse

Thank you. It was my intention to make the style sheet external. I kept
it there so it would be easier to be critiqued.

In article <Coj0d.21431$2s.10552 (AT) twister (DOT) nyroc.rr.com>,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous (AT) example (DOT) invalid> wrote:

Quoth the raven Always More Questions:

I hope you will be gentle, at least I have it validated.

There are a few links that aren't correct, but I'm working on
those.

You should get your facts correct. You say:

"The Yankees are baseball's most dominant team at every position. They
have won a record 22 World Series and 33 AL pennants..."

The Yanks have won 26 World Series and 39 AL pennants.

That's what I get for cheating off of a sixth graders paper. Thanks

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.
http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

Is this your only page? All the links seem to lead to other sites. If
so, ok. If not, move your CSS into a separate file and link to it.

It's the pilot page so I can learn how to do it. Eventually, for better
or worse, there will be a page for each team, each team in the other
leagues, etc.

Thanks again.

In article <opsd4apsgy6v6656 (AT) news (DOT) individual.net>,
Neal <neal413 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

Great you're using CSS, but I'm sorry, have to take a pass. I'm a devout
Red Sox fan, I'm sure you understand. I kinda get sick.

Have fun, all.

I kinda like the Dolphins, but that's another time and another site.

Thanks

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
<thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
group?)

You could try alt.desgin.graphics, but people here are quite willing
to argue about colors.

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

I don't think anyone does. The collapsible-ness of your main page
becomes a drawback when the window is made smaller. Seems like a case
of 6 of one; half-dozen of another, although I think I'd prefer a
horizontal scrollbar to one word (partially hidden) lines of text.

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:34:29 GMT, Frogleg <frogleg (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote:

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
group?)

You could try alt.desgin.graphics, but people here are quite willing
to argue about colors.

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

I don't think anyone does. The collapsible-ness of your main page
becomes a drawback when the window is made smaller. Seems like a case
of 6 of one; half-dozen of another, although I think I'd prefer a
horizontal scrollbar to one word (partially hidden) lines of text.

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/

Took a really fast peek. The real problem is the left column is fixed due
to the image, so the other two have to smush way too much. That's a
problem with the basic design. That image must be made smaller or have
very narrow content next to it. As it is, it's impractical.

Oh no, I think I just saw Jeter. I have to close it up, sorry.

In article <opsd6jvaqy6v6656 (AT) news (DOT) individual.net>,
Neal <neal413 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:34:29 GMT, Frogleg <frogleg (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote:

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
thanIhaveanswersfor (AT) domain (DOT) invalid> wrote:

I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
group?)

You could try alt.desgin.graphics, but people here are quite willing
to argue about colors.

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

I don't think anyone does. The collapsible-ness of your main page
becomes a drawback when the window is made smaller. Seems like a case
of 6 of one; half-dozen of another, although I think I'd prefer a
horizontal scrollbar to one word (partially hidden) lines of text.

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/


Took a really fast peek. The real problem is the left column is fixed due
to the image, so the other two have to smush way too much. That's a
problem with the basic design. That image must be made smaller or have
very narrow content next to it. As it is, it's impractical.

Oh no, I think I just saw Jeter. I have to close it up, sorry.

I'd truly like to have a smaller better image, but the existing image
does have quite an impact. As it is, there probably won't be too much
content (I'm trying for more).

Thanks for the critique.