![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'd appreciate comments about the web site at www.aljones.us - especailly suggestion about how to change the sizes of different divisions. |
|
the lettering on the navigation div should (I think) be centered vertically in the div. |
|
Also - with my desktop resolution of 1280 x 1024 the images of the diary pages in 08/17/63 shift on the page. |
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
al jones wrote: That'll teach me to try to make mass changes. This should look better. I'd appreciate comments about the web site at www.aljones.us - especailly suggestion about how to change the sizes of different divisions. BoxBanner is too tall for my taste, for example and the How about adding .boxbanner { height: 6em; } okay, I see that - but like 5em better. and using h1 { margin-top: 0; } and okay. lettering on the navigation div should (I think) be centered vertically in the div. No, I would expect the navigation to start at the top of the pane. Okay, I'll move the bottom of that pane up then .... still not what I want |
|
Also - with my desktop resolution of 1280 x 1024 the images of the diary pages in 08/17/63 shift on the page. Can ayone tell me how to stop / correct this please. I would try to put the letter images (and their links) inside the <p>, rather than loosely contained in the <div>. I'm going to have to experiment here. I read what you're saying, but not |
|
Why do you have all those "<br/>" in the nav list? li><a href="630817vad.html">08/17/63 WWvA Diary</a><br/></li not sure, but they went away before I saw your message. A lot of this |
|
Have you looked at the page with Firefox? The menu div shows a lot wider than it does with Opera ... No, I haven't, but I know that's going to be an issue (I seldom even look |
#4
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
al jones wrote: I'd appreciate comments about the web site at www.aljones.us - especailly suggestion about how to change the sizes of different divisions. FYI, you have a logic error with the column widths. The navigation column width is set at 18%. The left margin of the content column is 12em. These don't jive and cause disproportionate spacing at smaller window and/or larger text sizes. Use either % for both, or em for both. Which to use depends on whether you want the column width to adjust with the window size, or with the text size. Right now it doesn't really adapt that well to either. I've downloaded Firefox (BTS's question about whether I've looked at in FF) |
|
Are the blue borders there just for debugging purposes, or are they meant to stay? I find they cause some readability issues with smaller window sizes (my usual is slightly less than 800px wide). There are only a couple pixels of space between the border and text. If the borders go away, it's a non-issue. The lighter borders are intended to stay - the heavier one is, indeed a |
|
Is there a reason to limit the height of the side navigation? I don't see the benefit. Scrolling divs are a PITA from a usability standpoint. As I've been adding letters in the past, that nav column comes up with |
|
the lettering on the navigation div should (I think) be centered vertically in the div. If you mean the horizontal list across the top, setting the top/bottom margins on the <ul> element to 0 would be a place to start. Add a little top/bottom padding if you want more vertical spacing. Padding can work better in some cases because it prevents margin collapse. Collapsing margins can have undesirable results. The subject of collapsing margins has come up numerous times in the CSS newsgroup (c.i.w.a.stylesheets) so look there for more info. The google groups archives are your best resource. Also - with my desktop resolution of 1280 x 1024 the images of the diary pages in 08/17/63 shift on the page. Floating left does not automatically start an element at the left edge of its container. Look up the "clear" property. BTW, you have not set a background color for the whole page (body). My browser default color (a greenish hue) shows and does not go especially well with the rest of your color scheme. And as many times as I've seen this comment I didn't. Sorry blue on green |
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:42:19 -0600, Bergamot wrote: al jones wrote: www.aljones.us FYI, you have a logic error with the column widths. I've downloaded Firefox (BTS's question about whether I've looked at in FF) and think that what I see there is a result of what you're saying here - is that true?? |
|
this is strictly for family - but I would like it to look reasonable. |
|
I did the scrolling navigation since many of the letters will set on a screen - at least as I view them - if I don't scroll it then I often end up with a window that's 5 miles long on navigation and 6 feet long on content. Suggestion on a 'happy medium'?? |
|
BTW, you have not set a background color for the whole page (body). suggestions for a happy medium here so that I don't blind people for whom stark white is too bright |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Here is what I see in Firefox: http://k75s.home.att.net/show/aljones.jpg |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Here is what I see in Firefox: http://k75s.home.att.net/show/aljones.jpg I just noticed a misteak in the CSS. #body {height:100%;} should be: body {height:100%;} as there is no element with the *ID* of "body". Add your background color to body (no #) as I currently see my default light purple. body {height:100%; background-color: #f5f5f5;} and remove the background color from the child elements. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |