Re: Website Test

[ X-posted: ahc; F'up: ahc ]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:27:24 +0200, Borrox <Spamoff (AT) foad (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Is there a specific NG where I can post to to have my site criticised for
good or bad?

It's right next door at alt.html.critique.

www.nigs1000.f2s.com/index.htm.

Technically this thing is a nightmare. Besides the errors in markup
<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nigs1000.f2s.com%2Finde x.htm>
it has valid stuff onboard like <strong><img src="Images/top_trumps_ref.gif"
width="443" height="165"></strong></font></p><p></p></div></td> which is a
simple case of bad coding. The tables are no good for layout, the script for
menus mean that visitors without javascript cannot use that specific menu (and
one of them is Google, which will not be able to index what is behind a
javascript menu).

To top all that, the looks as I first arive, are bad too.
<http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_test/ttr.png> Hint: You don't know the size
of my viewport, you don't know if your visitor can see your images, you don't
know what the default background color of the browser of your visitor is.

Done hinting. Good luck,


--
,-- --<--@ -- PretLetters: 'woest wyf', met vele interesses: ----------.

weblog | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html |
webontwerp | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html |
zweefvliegen | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html |
`-------------------------------------------------- --<--@ ------------'