Re: Please Critique

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:23:14 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell <leo (AT) greatbasin (DOT) com> wrote:

Ugly and functional is much better than
beautiful and nonfunctional. There are exceptions, but I'm too old to
remember what they are.

<http://www.csszengarden.com/> ?


--
,-- --<--@ -- PretLetters: 'woest wyf', met vele interesses: ----------.

weblog | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html |
webontwerp | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html |
zweefvliegen | http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html |
`-------------------------------------------------- --<--@ ------------'

In article <opsvhizzmux5vgts@zoete_b>,
"Barbara de Zoete" <b_de_zoete (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:23:14 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell <leo (AT) greatbasin (DOT) com
wrote:

Ugly and functional is much better than
beautiful and nonfunctional. There are exceptions, but I'm too old to
remember what they are.


http://www.csszengarden.com/> ?

We'll pretend this isn't an international forum and that I'm only
joking. I was thinking of a certain female societal class :-p
On second thought, I shouldn't have posted that at all.
Now, why are we chopping up the Zen Garden? I really have missed the
discussion. After looking at it in a modern browser, it's nice enough,
loads quickly, resizes well, and it even works in Lynx :-)

leo

--
<http://web0.greatbasin.net/~leo/