HighDots Forums  

Please review my site

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Please review my site in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
barry@motivateddesign.co.uk
 
Posts: n/a

Default Please review my site - 06-26-2007 , 01:52 PM






Hi all,

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk
Also looking for work - people wanting creative CSS, XHTML sites,
nothing to big etc

Regards

Barry Cooper


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Frank Vest
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Please review my site - 06-26-2007 , 03:04 PM






line 68 column 6 - Warning: trimming empty <p>
line 79 column 74 - Warning: trimming empty <span>

Other than that, it looks fine to me ... but what do I know?

Regards,
Frank


barry (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:

Quote:
Hi all,

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk
Also looking for work - people wanting creative CSS, XHTML sites,
nothing to big etc

Regards

Barry Cooper


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Chris F.A. Johnson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Please review my site - 06-26-2007 , 03:12 PM



On 2007-06-26, barry (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:
Quote:
Hi all,

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk
Also looking for work - people wanting creative CSS, XHTML sites,
nothing to big etc
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/motiv.jpg>

Why use a transitional doctype for a new page?

Why XHTML?

Why fixed px widths? They mean that the page doesn't fill a wide
window, and introduces horizontal scrolling on narrower windows.

--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
barry@motivateddesign.co.uk
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Please review my site - 06-26-2007 , 04:18 PM



On Jun 26, 9:14 pm, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m... (AT) example (DOT) invalid> wrote:
Quote:
b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:
Hi all,

putting myself out on a limb.

by multi-posting. You already have answers in alt.html.

This actually should have been the one group to post to.

http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#xpost

--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Sorry

I am new to google forms, and was just following advice. I will be
sure to post stuff in on place in future.

Regards

Barry



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Jim Moe
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Please review my site - 06-26-2007 , 08:04 PM



barry (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:
Quote:
putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk

Your graphics design and color scheme is quite nice, appealing. (That
was nice.)

Your page markup is not so good.
- Use of XHTML, and why Transitional?
Are you generating the Web pages from an XML source with XSLT? And is
that same XML source generating print output or PDF? If not, there is no
reason to use XHTML. Use HTML Strict instead.
- The body text size is 12 px, 75% of my preferred size, and too damn
small to read.
- Fixed width design.
- The layout degrades to unreadability in places when to font size is
increased even by 120%. Particularly noticeable on the Services page.
- Div-itis: Replacing standard markup elements with CSS-defined classes
that do the same thing. E.g.: .h1, .h2., .h3. There is a net loss of
information since HTML, the HyperText MARKUP Language, is not being used
to mark up much.
- Replacing block elements (h1, h2, p) with a <span>, in inline element.
What's with that?
- The W3C logos mean nothing to most people, and is simply expected by
those who do know what they represent.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
barry@motivateddesign.co.uk
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Please review my site - 06-27-2007 , 01:41 AM



On Jun 27, 2:04 am, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA... (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk

Your graphics design and color scheme is quite nice, appealing. (That
was nice.)

Your page markup is not so good.
- Use of XHTML, and why Transitional?
Are you generating the Web pages from an XML source with XSLT? And is
that same XML source generating print output or PDF? If not, there is no
reason to use XHTML. Use HTML Strict instead.
- The body text size is 12 px, 75% of my preferred size, and too damn
small to read.
- Fixed width design.
- The layout degrades to unreadability in places when to font size is
increased even by 120%. Particularly noticeable on the Services page.
- Div-itis: Replacing standard markup elements with CSS-defined classes
that do the same thing. E.g.: .h1, .h2., .h3. There is a net loss of
information since HTML, the HyperText MARKUP Language, is not being used
to mark up much.
- Replacing block elements (h1, h2, p) with a <span>, in inline element.
What's with that?
- The W3C logos mean nothing to most people, and is simply expected by
those who do know what they represent.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
Thanks everyone for your advice,

I have spent the last 5 years teaching computer science in school, and
have had enough.
Then had a bright idea, you used to be a web designer, may be I should
do that again.
But that was in the days of the good old table and I am learning CSS
stuff as a go along.
Teaching does not (in my experience) allow time to learn interesting
new stuff.

I will try to make all of the recommended changes and if I feel brave
post the site again for another going over.

Regards and thanks again

Barry



Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Chaddy2222
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Please review my site - 06-27-2007 , 02:20 AM



On Jun 27, 4:41 pm, "b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk"
<b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 27, 2:04 am, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA... (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:





b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk

Your graphics design and color scheme is quite nice, appealing. (That
was nice.)

Your page markup is not so good.
- Use of XHTML, and why Transitional?
Are you generating the Web pages from an XML source with XSLT? And is
that same XML source generating print output or PDF? If not, there is no
reason to use XHTML. Use HTML Strict instead.
- The body text size is 12 px, 75% of my preferred size, and too damn
small to read.
- Fixed width design.
- The layout degrades to unreadability in places when to font size is
increased even by 120%. Particularly noticeable on the Services page.
- Div-itis: Replacing standard markup elements with CSS-defined classes
that do the same thing. E.g.: .h1, .h2., .h3. There is a net loss of
information since HTML, the HyperText MARKUP Language, is not being used
to mark up much.
- Replacing block elements (h1, h2, p) with a <span>, in inline element.
What's with that?
- The W3C logos mean nothing to most people, and is simply expected by
those who do know what they represent.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

Thanks everyone for your advice,

I have spent the last 5 years teaching computer science in school, and
have had enough.
Then had a bright idea, you used to be a web designer, may be I should
do that again.
But that was in the days of the good old table and I am learning CSS
stuff as a go along.
Teaching does not (in my experience) allow time to learn interesting
new stuff.

I will try to make all of the recommended changes and if I feel brave
post the site again for another going over.

Regards and thanks again

Barry.
You should also read, http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/full-checklist.html
web accessibility is now law in the UK as well as other countries.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz





Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Chaddy2222
 
Posts: n/a

Default Web Accessibility Checklist was Re: Please review my site - 06-27-2007 , 02:30 AM



On Jun 27, 5:20 pm, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
sicur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.au> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 27, 4:41 pm, "b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk"



b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:04 am, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA... (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:

b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk

Your graphics design and color scheme is quite nice, appealing. (That
was nice.)

Your page markup is not so good.
- Use of XHTML, and why Transitional?
Are you generating the Web pages from an XML source with XSLT? And is
that same XML source generating print output or PDF? If not, there is no
reason to use XHTML. Use HTML Strict instead.
- The body text size is 12 px, 75% of my preferred size, and too damn
small to read.
- Fixed width design.
- The layout degrades to unreadability in places when to font size is
increased even by 120%. Particularly noticeable on the Services page.
- Div-itis: Replacing standard markup elements with CSS-defined classes
that do the same thing. E.g.: .h1, .h2., .h3. There is a net loss of
information since HTML, the HyperText MARKUP Language, is not being used
to mark up much.
- Replacing block elements (h1, h2, p) with a <span>, in inline element.
What's with that?
- The W3C logos mean nothing to most people, and is simply expected by
those who do know what they represent.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

Thanks everyone for your advice,

I have spent the last 5 years teaching computer science in school, and
have had enough.
Then had a bright idea, you used to be a web designer, may be I should
do that again.
But that was in the days of the good old table and I am learning CSS
stuff as a go along.
Teaching does not (in my experience) allow time to learn interesting
new stuff.

I will try to make all of the recommended changes and if I feel brave
post the site again for another going over.

Regards and thanks again

Barry.

You should also read,http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/full-checklist.html
web accessibility is now law in the UK as well as other countries.

Ahh, why I made this a new thread and posted it to these other groups
i'm not quite sure but I will / have changed the subject line to make
it read better.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
barry@motivateddesign.co.uk
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Web Accessibility Checklist was Re: Please review my site - 06-27-2007 , 02:39 AM



On Jun 27, 8:30 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
sicur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.au> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 27, 5:20 pm, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-

sicur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.au> wrote:
On Jun 27, 4:41 pm, "b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk"

b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:04 am, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA... (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:

b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk

Your graphics design and color scheme is quite nice, appealing. (That
was nice.)

Your page markup is not so good.
- Use of XHTML, and why Transitional?
Are you generating the Web pages from an XML source with XSLT? And is
that same XML source generating print output or PDF? If not, there is no
reason to use XHTML. Use HTML Strict instead.
- The body text size is 12 px, 75% of my preferred size, and too damn
small to read.
- Fixed width design.
- The layout degrades to unreadability in places when to font size is
increased even by 120%. Particularly noticeable on the Services page.
- Div-itis: Replacing standard markup elements with CSS-defined classes
that do the same thing. E.g.: .h1, .h2., .h3. There is a net loss of
information since HTML, the HyperText MARKUP Language, is not being used
to mark up much.
- Replacing block elements (h1, h2, p) with a <span>, in inline element.
What's with that?
- The W3C logos mean nothing to most people, and is simply expected by
those who do know what they represent.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

Thanks everyone for your advice,

I have spent the last 5 years teaching computer science in school, and
have had enough.
Then had a bright idea, you used to be a web designer, may be I should
do that again.
But that was in the days of the good old table and I am learning CSS
stuff as a go along.
Teaching does not (in my experience) allow time to learn interesting
new stuff.

I will try to make all of the recommended changes and if I feel brave
post the site again for another going over.

Regards and thanks again

Barry.

You should also read,http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/full-checklist.html
web accessibility is now law in the UK as well as other countries.

Ahh, why I made this a new thread and posted it to these other groups
i'm not quite sure but I will / have changed the subject line to make
it read better.
--
Regards Chad.http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
Thank Chad,

I have looked at the document and think I understand most of it.
Are there any good books on this subject?

Thanks

Barry



Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Chaddy2222
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Web Accessibility Checklist was Re: Please review my site - 06-27-2007 , 03:36 AM



On Jun 27, 5:39 pm, "b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk"
<b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 27, 8:30 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-



sicur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.au> wrote:
On Jun 27, 5:20 pm, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-

sicur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.au> wrote:
On Jun 27, 4:41 pm, "b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk"

b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:04 am, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA... (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:

b... (AT) motivateddesign (DOT) co.uk wrote:

putting myself out on a limb.
i am just starting life as a freelance web designer, and would value
any (nice) feedback on my site
www.motivateddesign.co.uk

Your graphics design and color scheme is quite nice, appealing. (That
was nice.)

Your page markup is not so good.
- Use of XHTML, and why Transitional?
Are you generating the Web pages from an XML source with XSLT? And is
that same XML source generating print output or PDF? If not, there is no
reason to use XHTML. Use HTML Strict instead.
- The body text size is 12 px, 75% of my preferred size, and too damn
small to read.
- Fixed width design.
- The layout degrades to unreadability in places when to font size is
increased even by 120%. Particularly noticeable on the Services page.
- Div-itis: Replacing standard markup elements with CSS-defined classes
that do the same thing. E.g.: .h1, .h2., .h3. There is a net loss of
information since HTML, the HyperText MARKUP Language, is not being used
to mark up much.
- Replacing block elements (h1, h2, p) with a <span>, in inline element.
What's with that?
- The W3C logos mean nothing to most people, and is simply expected by
those who do know what they represent.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

Thanks everyone for your advice,

I have spent the last 5 years teaching computer science in school, and
have had enough.
Then had a bright idea, you used to be a web designer, may be I should
do that again.
But that was in the days of the good old table and I am learning CSS
stuff as a go along.
Teaching does not (in my experience) allow time to learn interesting
new stuff.

I will try to make all of the recommended changes and if I feel brave
post the site again for another going over.

Regards and thanks again

Barry.

You should also read,http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/full-checklist.html
web accessibility is now law in the UK as well as other countries.

Ahh, why I made this a new thread and posted it to these other groups
i'm not quite sure but I will / have changed the subject line to make
it read better.
--
Regards Chad.http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz

Thank Chad,

I have looked at the document and think I understand most of it.
Are there any good books on this subject?

Thanks

Barry
Hi Bary, the full WCAG document can be found here http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/
and if you want a good general book on web design, then check out
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com
I hope that helps.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.