On 10/12/07 10:07 am, misterheal (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
I could use your expertise with this new site of mine:
The tool is free for the community to use...I only need feedback on
the design.
Then why post it in an HTML critique form?
|
Use of XHTML Transitional DTD (doctype). All new work should be using
Strict.
A mountain of validation errors. (See <http://validator.w3.org/>)
Despite the DTD much of the coding does not adhere to the language syntax.
Browser sniffing. Boo! Hiss!
The text is generally too small to read. 76%! You have something against
readability? And then the text color is a medium gray further lowering
readability. After increasing the text size 150% to make it readable, most
of the login content disappeared.
Poor use of markup. (It is the HyperText MARKUP Language.) For example,
<h4> is used to for visually bolding and sizing text, not as a header
element; there is not h1, h2 or h3, i.e., no header hierarchy. (Hint:
Search engines are fond of meaningful <h1>.)
Another example: No header used where one would be appropriate.
"<p>Extremely Stable, fast and secure <br> ..." "Extremely..." should be a
header, not just part of the paragraph.
--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)