Is this group basically dead?

Hi.
I notice that only a very few submissions are coming up in this group, which
used to be quite active.. Dead now?

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:08:28 +0000, BruceB wrote:

Hi.
I notice that only a very few submissions are coming up in this group, which
used to be quite active.. Dead now?

Too many chiefs and not enough indians :P

--
Ben M.

To reply directly, remove all occurrences of 'remove' from the email address.

Ben Measures wrote:

I notice that only a very few submissions are coming up in this group, which
used to be quite active.. Dead now?

Too many chiefs and not enough indians :P

Too many sub-standard submissions? Overly sensitive authors?

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

In article <k-6dnb4yEu0_e1TenZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com>,
Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN (AT) sohnen-moe (DOT) com> wrote:

Ben Measures wrote:

Too many chiefs and not enough indians :P

Too many sub-standard submissions? Overly sensitive authors?

Too many questions answered elsewhere without reference to here or
ciwas-d which isn't burning up the servers either. But the answers are
not as artistically detailed as here generally. More standards oriented
and less aesthetically oriented, I believe. And it's a loss.
But neither is dead yet, just asleep :-)

leo

--
<http://web0.greatbasin.net/~leo/>