HighDots Forums  

Re: Beginner @ HTML, no CSS, Java? HA! Site for Work

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Re: Beginner @ HTML, no CSS, Java? HA! Site for Work in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Fred
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Beginner @ HTML, no CSS, Java? HA! Site for Work - 07-13-2003 , 03:59 PM






On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:57:27 +0100, David Dorward <dorward (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

David ... I found your critique to be very thorough and informative.
I learned some things that I wasn't aware of...thanks ! I hope that
you can expand on a couple of these for me.

Quote:
(2) You claim to be using HTML 4.01 Transitional (even though new documents
should be written using HTML 4.01 Strict) but fail to follow the spec:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...companies.com/
I am also using HTML 4.01 Transitional and my site validates. Can you
tell me where it is stated that "new documents should use strict"?


Quote:
(6) You use block capitals in a number of places, these are hard to read.
[In your follow-up post, you add:
Quote:
Then at least use CSS to capitalise it and use normal case in the HTML.
IIRC, some screen readers spell out capitalised words.]
I encountered this very problem with some acronyms; I discovered it
when I viewed my page via IBM Home Page Reader. In my case, it isn't
really block text, but acronyms...it actually tried to "pronounce" one
as a word. I still have to go back and code <abbr>. Should I use
CSS text-transform in conjunction with <abbr>, or are they mutually
exclusive in this case?

Thanks
Fred


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Toby A Inkster
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Beginner @ HTML, no CSS, Java? HA! Site for Work - 07-13-2003 , 06:48 PM






On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:59:21 -0400, Fred wrote:

Quote:
I am also using HTML 4.01 Transitional and my site validates. Can you
tell me where it is stated that "new documents should use strict"?
There is nowhere that says this (well, nowhere "official"). However, the
HTML 4.01 standard lists a number of elements and attributes as
"deprecated". These elements are ones that you should really be avoiding.

Also, there is a strong correlation between deprecated elements and the
differences between Strict and Transitional:

http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/elements.html

You'll find a similar relationship in the attributes:

http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/attributes.html

Notice all the "extra" elements in Transitional are deprecated (except
iframe), so if you are using Transitional instead of Strict, it is
probably because you are using deprecated elements, which is a Bad Thing.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink (AT) goddamn (DOT) co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39
aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tai (AT) jabber (DOT) linux.it
http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!"
playing://(nothing)


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.