![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've been trying to add more content and make the site w3c compatible. Is it looking ok? |
| http://www.glenmeadows.com |
|
The errors when checking on the w3 org site are from the Quotations page javascript . |
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
wayne wrote: I've been trying to add more content and make the site w3c compatible. Is it looking ok? It is a .. bit .. red. <g |
| http://www.glenmeadows.com I like it, except for one thing. You have many buttons on the menu. I would suggest that all buttons that go to external sites, most of which appear not to be associated with your Association, to put those on a separate page. Remove the buttons, and maybe make a page to "Other favorite sites of ours" with conventional links and descriptions in the content area of that page. |
|
Opinion: the italic headers don't display as well as regular text would. |
|
The errors when checking on the w3 org site are from the Quotations page javascript . Didn't have JavaScript enabled... |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: wayne wrote: I've been trying to add more content and make the site w3c compatible. Is it looking ok? It is a .. bit .. red. <g My bride would like it a little more subdued too, but does it catch your eye? ;p |
| http://www.glenmeadows.com I like it, except for one thing. You have many buttons on the menu. I would suggest that all buttons that go to external sites, most of which appear not to be associated with your Association, to put those on a separate page. Remove the buttons, and maybe make a page to "Other favorite sites of ours" with conventional links and descriptions in the content area of that page. Thank you, I changed it as per your suggestion. I did have a second menu on the right, but it looked like Mickey Mouse (ears) so I removed it. |
|
Opinion: the italic headers don't display as well as regular text would. Thanks again, removed the italics. Just trying for some variety in the text. Will look for another way to add variety while staying readable. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
wayne wrote: My bride would like it a little more subdued too, but does it catch your eye? ;p ABSOLUTELY!!!1!! Aha, I see an "Other Links" page now. That'll do. Yes, I think it looks better with the non-italic font you now have. Oh, discovered this: went to the Documents page, found a new menu of various things. Picked ByLaws. When ByLaws content came up, the menu changed back to the main menu, and not the Documents menu. If I wanted to read about "Elections" I would have to go back to Documents, instead of just clicking on "Election" after reading ByLaws. IOW, menu of the various documents should stay in place. |
|
Heh, was that clear? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Oh, discovered this: went to the Documents page, found a new menu of various things. Picked ByLaws. When ByLaws content came up, the menu changed back to the main menu, and not the Documents menu. If I wanted to read about "Elections" I would have to go back to Documents, instead of just clicking on "Election" after reading ByLaws. IOW, menu of the various documents should stay in place. Yes, I've been a little lazy on that. I created another menu and placed it on those pages. While I was at it, some of the other documents weren't listed there either. Some of the forms are now on the main menu and the documents sub menu. I want them available to the homeowners without them having to search very hard. Is this acceptable, or is the main menu still too long? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've been trying to add more content and make the site w3c compatible. Is it looking ok? http://www.glenmeadows.com The errors when checking on the w3 org site are from the Quotations page javascript . Regards, |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
wayne wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I see that you've corrected the Document menu; that's good. What forms were you referencing? The Google Search box? That's the only one I see. Re length of menu: I guess it's acceptable now, though the Recipes also seems to be not related to the Association. Were you going to remove the form defaults on Suggestions? Visitors who mouse between form elements rather than use the tab key will have to first delete your "Your name?" content. If you don't, expect entries such as "Your name? Jane Doe" ... On the "5. None of the above" I would change that to "5. Other" |

#9
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
|
Just a few thoughts: Opening page: ========= a href="http://www.glenmeadows.com/" title="Home">Home</a a href="/arcform.shtml" title="Architectrial change submission form">ARC Form</a a href="/contacts.shtml" title="Contacts">Contacts</a etc. etc. { Put some dividers between entries in the menu e.g. "|"; alternatively mark the links up as a list } I assume you have css disabled or have a device that does not use it? I |
|
{question: why comment-out the 'skip-navigation' link? } |
|
.................................................. ....................... ............................ h2>La Porte Community Library<br / A Harris County Public Library<br / 600 S. Broadway<br / La Porte, Texas 77571</h2 {I'd suggest that only the first line is the header. Also, put some punctuation at the end of each line e.g. commas and full-stop.} |
|
.................................................. ....................... ............................ p>Our special events include:<br/ Easter egg Hunt<br/ Before School picnic<br/ Christmas hayride<br/ Welcoming committee<br/ Yard of the Month<br/ /p {This would be better marked up as a list. Alternatively, place some punctuation at the end of each line to prevent the items running into each other.} |
|
.................................................. ....................... ............................ table border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding =5 align=CENTER tr td>New Year's Day</td td>1st Day in January</td td>Saturday, January 01, 2005</td /tr { (a) insert a 'summary' for those UAs that can use it. (b) insert some column headers (you can make these 'invisible' through CSS if you need to) to assist navigation. If you don't, many non-visual UAs will assume that the first entries are column headers } .................................................. ....................... ............................ Articles of Inc. page ============ { Various typos (mainly missing spaces) -- applies to other pages -- suggest a trip through a spell-checker might be useful. } |
|
.................................................. ....................... ............................ DCCR's 4a page ========== W I T N E S S E T H: { Code this as WITNESSETH: and use CSS to space the letters in the word } ELECTION page ========== h5>by: Jeffrey A. Goldberg</h5 { Is this really a heading? and why level 5? } .................................................. ....................... ............................ 1. Notice 2. Registration & Quorum Requirements etc. { Are these not list items? ditto for other lists further down the page.} |
|
.................................................. ....................... ............................ regards. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: wayne wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I see that you've corrected the Document menu; that's good. What forms were you referencing? The Google Search box? That's the only one I see. Were you going to remove the form defaults on Suggestions? Visitors who mouse between form elements rather than use the tab key will have to first delete your "Your name?" content. If you don't, expect entries such as "Your name? Jane Doe" ... On the "5. None of the above" I would change that to "5. Other" Thanks again for your time and help. There are several forms available, one is "Management" which is for sending email to the management company (without exposing their email address), YOM for submitting candidates for yard of the month, "Newsletter" for submitting entries to the community newsletter, etc. Perhaps I need a page with just forms on it, but I want them to be readily available. What is your suggestion? |
|
I did remove the defaults from the suggestions form, although the default at least insured there would be some entry in each field ![]() Also changed the "None of the above" to "Other". Still learning! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |