Critique please

Disco Octopus wrote:

Toby A Inkster wrote:
Disco Octopus wrote:

no reason for Col Biggo, but if I am to craete a *new* page then I
will use the latest spec/recommendation.

Then why not XHTML 1.1?

no reason.

I see. Care to expand?

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com

William Tasso wrote:

Disco Octopus wrote:
Toby A Inkster wrote:
Disco Octopus wrote:

no reason for Col Biggo, but if I am to craete a *new* page then I
will use the latest spec/recommendation.

Then why not XHTML 1.1?

no reason.

I see. Care to expand?

Not really. But here are a couple of my reasons....

* For the same reason I will upgrade to UNIFACE 8.3.01 from UNIFACE 8.2.03.
IE. It is the latest version of a technology/idea/methodology and I like
keeping up with the latest. The only thing that will/may keep me from this
is the instability of such a new technology. So, maybe 1 minor release
behind the latest release is a good goal to keep to.

* I used to be of the mind set that everything on the web is for sharing. I
remember when things like veronica for gopher, archie for ftp, and such
things where around, the internet was a place that only had information.
That is all it had. Information. It was up to you, the seeker, to do what
you want with that information. (well... this is how I saw it anyway. (and
a little diversion into memory lane for a moment))
.... anyway, this is the same concept that I feel is coming back in the way
people want to set standards now - here comes XML / XHTML.
The fact that this concept that all _web_ *pages* on the internet are in
fact _information_ *pages* has really brought this idea back to the way the
internet was supposed to be (perhaps dangerous words - remember, this is my
opinion only).
I feel that all pages should be able to be *grabbed*, *redisplayed*, *used*,
etc (copyright and moral obligations not discussed here) at the seekers
will. Remembering, that XHTML allows this to be done as data, and not
simply a pretty brochure.

This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone.

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:24:10 +1000, Disco wrote the following message
<ODZyb.170$gF5.6520 (AT) nnrp1 (DOT) ozemail.com.au>:

This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone.

Why start a new thread when I specifically ignored the last, keep your
response in the same thread.

"This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone." -
Disco

Anduin
--
,,,,,
(o o)
*----------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo----------------------------*

o DreamCities - Fast & Reliable Hosting |
o http://dreamcities.net - 5mb FREE Hosting also available! |
*!* Reply to: anduin at dreamcities.net |
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*

Anduin wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:24:10 +1000, Disco wrote the following message
ODZyb.170$gF5.6520 (AT) nnrp1 (DOT) ozemail.com.au>:

This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone.

Why start a new thread ...

hmmm - Disco didn't start a new thread in the group although it may appear
like that in the archive and some news readers. Merely a change of subject
header in this case.

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com

Colin <c.biggoREMOVESPAM (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote:

It seems from what you are saying that there is not to much that needs
fixing with this page.

It doesn't take much to cripple a page. Since your page has few things on
it, there is a finite amount of errors that you can make.

Fix the menu contrast issue.

--
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

Anduin wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:24:10 +1000, Disco wrote the following message
ODZyb.170$gF5.6520 (AT) nnrp1 (DOT) ozemail.com.au>:

This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone.

Why start a new thread when I specifically ignored the last, keep your
response in the same thread.

What new thread? Broken news client?

--
Blinky - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Linux RU 297263
[still no new sig]

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:25:26 -0000, William Tasso wrote the following
message <bqi77p$21sc36$1 (AT) ID-139074 (DOT) news.uni-berlin.de>:

Anduin wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:24:10 +1000, Disco wrote the following message
ODZyb.170$gF5.6520 (AT) nnrp1 (DOT) ozemail.com.au>:

This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone.

Why start a new thread ...

hmmm - Disco didn't start a new thread in the group although it may appear
like that in the archive and some news readers. Merely a change of subject
header in this case.

Hmm <looks in settings> damnit.

Well, doesn't that suck ;o)

Anduin

On 2 Dec 2003 23:34:14 GMT, Blinky the Shark wrote the following message
<slrnbsq8cj.saf.no.spam (AT) thurston (DOT) blinkynet.net>:

Anduin wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:24:10 +1000, Disco wrote the following message
ODZyb.170$gF5.6520 (AT) nnrp1 (DOT) ozemail.com.au>:

This is my opinion... and my opinion has never been set in stone.

Why start a new thread when I specifically ignored the last, keep your
response in the same thread.

What new thread? Broken news client?

Actually, I messed about with a setting in my client to make a new
thread if the subject header is changed. Mistake on my part.

Anduin
--
,,,,,
(o o)
*----------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo----------------------------*

o DreamCities - Fast & Reliable Hosting |
o http://dreamcities.net - 5mb FREE Hosting also available! |
*!* Reply to: anduin at dreamcities.net |
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*

Anduin wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:25:26 -0000, William Tasso wrote the following
message <bqi77p$21sc36$1 (AT) ID-139074 (DOT) news.uni-berlin.de>:
...
Merely a
change of subject header in this case.

Hmm <looks in settings> damnit.

Well, doesn't that suck ;o)

LOL - sorted now?

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com