Critique Please ;-)

http://www.madtownlounge.com

I'm open to suggestions please.

Thanks!

On Sat, 06 May 2006 01:18:12 +0200, <allen.mcguire (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

http://www.madtownlounge.com

I'm open to suggestions please.

One in a milion, old fashioned design, with way too many errors in your
code, even when auto switched to transitional instead of strict:
<URL:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madtownlounge.com>

Also errors in thinking, planning, understanding what you're doing:
<URL:http://www.pretletters.net/_test/common_mistakes_with_html4-01-strict_pages.html>

Good luck with it.


--
______PretLetters:

weblog | http://www.pretletters.net/weblog/weblog.html |
webontwerp | http://www.pretletters.net/html/webontwerp.html |
zweefvliegen | http://www.pretletters.net/html/vliegen.html |

[amcguire72]

I don't appreciate the feedback since your comments were based on nothing more than a glance and an automated scan tool - the results of which you probably didn't read.

First, I don't know of many sites that adhere to the strict dtd just yet. I could go blue in the face ensuring my <img> tags were all properly closed off with " />" , but I'm not concerned about that. Most of the errors were minor HTML niceties - not like I'm missing closing tags or something.

Secondly, I would like to think my site isn't all that old fashioned, considering it's very similar to YouTube - a multi-million dollar site waiting to happen (someone will buy it out)! Also, have you seen MySpace? I think flashy sites are going out fast - people want information, and they want it without having to wait for 100 images to preload.

Replies and additional feedback are welcome. Take more than 10 seconds to post a reply, however.

Allen