crit

...and before you say it... yes i know it looks similar to a well known
software companies web site. this is by specification.

http://sudden.neue.co.uk

the site has been designed to be edited by a CMS so i cant use fancy xhtml
or anything this time around

mark

..and before you say it... yes i know it looks similar to a well known
software companies web site. this is by specification.

http://sudden.neue.co.uk

Looks fair to me, nice layout and colour scheme. Good alignments and
associations. I would align the subtitles, such as "Pegasus Software", with
the associated text but maybe that's just me ;-)

Graphics at the top are a bit fuzzy and indistinct. Particularly the "dte"
in the orange square and "accounting software & systems".

Text size could be a bit bigger too I think.

Tables ??

Why can't you use XHTML with a CMS?

What does the meta tag "revisit-after" do?

Chris

Chris Harris wrote:

...
What does the meta tag "revisit-after" do?

provides a clue to SE spiders wrt the authors intentions for update cycles
on the page content. Largely (completely?) ignored by commercial spiders
(google et al) it is virtually worthless and a waste of bandwidth.

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com

thanks...

the CMS is set at html4 content and as the client expects to be able to edit
the site WYSIWYG it helps to hekeep things structured.

mark

"Chris Harris" <chris.harris (AT) cwfi (DOT) co.fk> wrote

..and before you say it... yes i know it looks similar to a well known
software companies web site. this is by specification.

http://sudden.neue.co.uk


Looks fair to me, nice layout and colour scheme. Good alignments and
associations. I would align the subtitles, such as "Pegasus Software",
with
the associated text but maybe that's just me ;-)

Graphics at the top are a bit fuzzy and indistinct. Particularly the "dte"
in the orange square and "accounting software & systems".

Text size could be a bit bigger too I think.

Tables ??

Why can't you use XHTML with a CMS?

What does the meta tag "revisit-after" do?

Chris

"mark | r" <trooperbill (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

http://sudden.neue.co.uk

The text is just barely too large - I can still make out the words if I
squint. Or, did you want people to read it? It's so hard to tell with
some of these pages if the designer is joking or not. Your page borders
on amusing.

Also, that grey which you are using for the dates is perfect! It's
practically invisible. I just love the way that you toned down the
interactive nature of this page by not using rollovers.

The page doesn't validate, either:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht....neue.co.uk%2F

--
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

"Farlo" <hall.j.m (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote

"mark | r" <trooperbill (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

http://sudden.neue.co.uk

The text is just barely too large - I can still make out the words if I
squint. Or, did you want people to read it? It's so hard to tell with
some of these pages if the designer is joking or not. Your page borders
on amusing.

Also, that grey which you are using for the dates is perfect! It's
practically invisible. I just love the way that you toned down the
interactive nature of this page by not using rollovers.

The page doesn't validate, either:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht....neue.co.uk%2F

Point(s) taken i will add 'interactivity' back (although i think rollover
buttons are barely that) as for the validation, the sites in development and
some things are completely missing so i need to get these form the client
before i do any of that

mark

just checked the validation and apart from a typ-o the remaining major
issues are with a link to streetmap.com and i am hardly responsible for this
as the link is one they set!

mark
"Farlo" <hall.j.m (AT) att (DOT) net> wrote

"mark | r" <trooperbill (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

http://sudden.neue.co.uk

The text is just barely too large - I can still make out the words if I
squint. Or, did you want people to read it? It's so hard to tell with
some of these pages if the designer is joking or not. Your page borders
on amusing.

Also, that grey which you are using for the dates is perfect! It's
practically invisible. I just love the way that you toned down the
interactive nature of this page by not using rollovers.

The page doesn't validate, either:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht....neue.co.uk%2F

--
Farlo, the Urban Fey Dragon

mark | r wrote:

just checked the validation and apart from a typ-o the remaining major
issues are with a link to streetmap.com and i am hardly responsible for this
as the link is one they set!

But it is hardly difficult to fix! Just change:

http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap...408071&a=y&z=1

to:

http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap...;a=y&am p;z=1

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132

"mark | r" <trooperbill (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

..and before you say it... yes i know it looks similar to a well known
software companies web site. this is by specification.

http://sudden.neue.co.uk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/test/sudden.jpg

Cheers
Richard.

just checked the validation and apart from a typ-o the remaining major
issues are with a link to streetmap.com and i am hardly responsible for
this
as the link is one they set!

But it is hardly difficult to fix! Just change:
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap...408071&a=y&z=1
to:

http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap...;a=y&am p;z=1

didnt know i could do that thanks!
mark