HighDots Forums  

Constructive Criticism Wanted

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Constructive Criticism Wanted in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Toby A Inkster
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-04-2003 , 06:42 PM






Mark Parnell wrote:

Quote:
Sometime around Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:36:54 +0000 (UTC), Daniel Ruscoe is
reported to have stated:

Brucie is a long-time contributor to a few web authoring groups and is
well respected, despite his... well, we'll call them hobbies. I think
the FBI has official terms for them.

The FBI has no jurisdiction over here...
They can still talk about his hobbies. Well, they can talk about the
hobbies for which there are words to describe.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132



Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Mark Parnell
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-04-2003 , 07:13 PM






Sometime around Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:42:39 +0000, Toby A Inkster is reported
to have stated:
Quote:
Mark Parnell wrote:

The FBI has no jurisdiction over here...

They can still talk about his hobbies. Well, they can talk about the
hobbies for which there are words to describe.
And if our PM has his way, they may well have jurisdiction here soon
enough.

--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
artist
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-04-2003 , 09:54 PM



Artist, the good little Microsoft drone heard "Chuck" <nospam (AT) here (DOT) com>
say...

Quote:
Let me try this again since my original post just happened to
disappear...

Could I please get some *constructive* criticism on a website?

It's temporarily located at http://www.geocities.com/my1964bug/

Yes, I realize that Geocities sucks, but the site will move to a new
home when it is completed.

Thanks...

Chuck
If this where my website I would get rid of the kids with the balloons,
and the big, times text and move the buttons/text/image of the business
up. The kids with the baloons are nice, and the graphics remind me of
kids, but they don't fit with the overall design of the page. Remember;
sometimes you have to discard your finest pieces to synergize the whole.



--
AIM: GCCFurryBoy
mellorya (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
http://www.practialdesigns.com/

"Neither hope nor fear" - Isabella d'Este
"For to do either is to fall to the beast" - Joseph Richmond
"The Cow Kings a Bastard! Long live the Cow King!" - Joseph Richmond


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-05-2003 , 12:04 AM



Toby A Inkster wrote:
Quote:
Chuck wrote:

http://www.geocities.com/my1964bug/

Not sure why you're using <h2>'s for your address, when HTML has a
perfectly good <address> element. Here is a rewrite of the top bit of
your page:
............
address><strong>Kids'R'Kids #123TX</strong><br
1234 Main Street<br
Arlington, Texas 76123<br
817-555-1234</address
Toby, what's the advantage of <address> (in terms of accessibility for
instance)?
Nico




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Toby A Inkster
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-05-2003 , 01:55 AM



Nico Schuyt wrote:

Quote:
Toby, what's the advantage of <address> (in terms of accessibility for
instance)?
Well currently he's using headings to mark up the address:

<h1>Kids'R'Kids #123TX</h1>
<h2>1234 Main Street</h2>
<h2>Arlington, Texas 76123</h2>
<h2>817-555-1234</h2>

This is clearly a Bad Thing, as it causes problems for browsers that allow
the user to jump from heading to heading as a navigation method (such as
Opera, Amaya, Dillo, many screen readers).

Thus it should be replaced with some single block level element wrapper,
given appropriate line breaks through <br> and styled appropriately.

Candidates for the above mentioned block level element are <p>, <div> and
<address>. Apart from a few rendering issues that can be fixed with CSS,
they will all be treated the same by browsers.

Hence the most appropriate element of the three should be chosen. As this
is an address, <address>.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132



Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
jake
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-05-2003 , 07:18 PM





O.K. The first page is looking much better.

(1) The alternative text on the last graphic: "take tour 2k" should be
"take tour" -- as that's the text that it's the alternative for.

On the next page of the tour (aboutus2.htm):
(1) I'd change the alternative text on the photo from "mattmamie3(20k)"
to something like "Photo: Matt and Mamie Dillon".
(2)The alternative text on the arrow on the bottom needs to be set to
the text that it's the alternative for -- "Next".

I'd also be inclined review the body text as one or two items don't read
as well as they could.

And on the next page of the tour (activities2.htm):
(1) "lobby2 (62k)" needs to be replaced with something like "Photo: the
lobby of <whatever>"
(2) The headings such as "General Information" and "Extra Curricular
Activities" need marking up as <H2>.
(3) Again, the alternative text on the photographs needs to be set to
something meaningful such as "Photo: <whatever>"
(4) There's a missing </body> and </html>

And I'm not sure why you keep using:
<ul> xxxxxx </ul>

e.g.
<ul>
Big Screen TV
</ul>

(If you tell us why, then we'll be able to suggest other ways of doing
it).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Remember that people who are visually impaired are going to be visiting
your site and using 'speaking browsers' -- so it's important that the
page mark-up is correct and that photos and graphics have meaningful
alternative text.

regards.


--
Jake

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-06-2003 , 01:18 AM



Toby A Inkster wrote:
Quote:
Nico Schuyt wrote:

Toby, what's the advantage of <address> (in terms of accessibility
for instance)?

...................
Candidates for the above mentioned block level element are <p>, <div
and <address>. Apart from a few rendering issues that can be fixed
with CSS, they will all be treated the same by browsers.
Hence the most appropriate element of the three should be chosen. As
this is an address, <address>.
Right.
Thanks! Nico




Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Sally Thompson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Constructive Criticism Wanted - 12-07-2003 , 04:30 PM



On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:16:44 GMT, "Chuck" <nospam (AT) here (DOT) com> wrote:

<snip>
Quote:
As far as asking, I already have. I asked for some webpages that will help
teach someone with no knowledge at all of CSS. Havent had any replies yet...
I would like to learn and use CSS...

Try:
http://www.w3schools.com/
http://www.pmob.co.uk/faqcss/tutorial1.htm

HTH

--
Sally in Shropshire, UK
New URL <http://www.stonybrook-ludlow.co.uk>
Reply To is spam trap
If you need to email use sally=thompson@btinternet=com and replace the = with a dot



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.