HighDots Forums  

Which is better plain or swf version?

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Which is better plain or swf version? in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
jj
 
Posts: n/a

Default Which is better plain or swf version? - 04-22-2004 , 07:21 PM






Hi everyone, I can't decide between two pages that I have. The only
difference really is the picture in the middle of the page.

The first on is just plain map with an Image Map added so that you can click
on a part of the map and be taken to that place.
http://www.jacksnest.com/trip/index.htm

The second page http://www.jacksnest.com/trip/index2.htm is a Macromedia
version of the map, but I can't add the Image Map to the picture - so you
can't click on the picture/movie and be taken to that place.

Which do you prefer?

Any other suggestions?

Thanks



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Nik Coughin
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Which is better plain or swf version? - 04-22-2004 , 07:30 PM






jj wrote:
Quote:
Hi everyone, I can't decide between two pages that I have. The only
difference really is the picture in the middle of the page.

The first on is just plain map with an Image Map added so that you
can click on a part of the map and be taken to that place.
http://www.jacksnest.com/trip/index.htm

The second page http://www.jacksnest.com/trip/index2.htm is a
Macromedia version of the map, but I can't add the Image Map to the
picture - so you can't click on the picture/movie and be taken to
that place.

Which do you prefer?

Any other suggestions?

Thanks
The first, there's no point in using Flash if it doesn't add anything,
especially if you can't get it to work. The moving car is unnecessary IMO.
If you really want to have it, you could always use JavaScript to move a
normal <img> around your map.




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
lil2red
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Which is better plain or swf version? - 05-04-2004 , 09:10 PM



I would like the first page better, if you could enhance your image map, and
define your links a little better. Also, maybe you could try to break up
the text more.
"jj" <joe (AT) joe (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Hi everyone, I can't decide between two pages that I have. The only
difference really is the picture in the middle of the page.

The first on is just plain map with an Image Map added so that you can
click
on a part of the map and be taken to that place.
http://www.jacksnest.com/trip/index.htm

The second page http://www.jacksnest.com/trip/index2.htm is a Macromedia
version of the map, but I can't add the Image Map to the picture - so you
can't click on the picture/movie and be taken to that place.

Which do you prefer?

Any other suggestions?

Thanks





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.