HighDots Forums  

Attractive?

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Attractive? in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Duende
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 03:56 PM






While sitting in a puddle Nico Schuyt scribbled in the mud:

Quote:
Safalra wrote:
Nico Schuyt wrote

www.intro-spect.co.uk
(Some day I'll use the effect with those sharp/unsharp pictures)

Ugh - the blurring when I move off an image makes my eyes water...

--- Safalra (Stephen Morley) ---
http://www.safalra.com/hyperpext

Hehehe, I can imagine you say that. In comparison with your
http://www.safalra.com even my (basic) sites must upset you :0
Nico

A dancing chicken would look nice on Stephen's site.


--
Duende
Recommended hosting
www.hostingforabuck.net
www.affordablehost.com


Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
artist
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 05:23 PM






"Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:402ddaa8$0$93707$cd19a363 (AT) news (DOT) wanadoo.nl:

Quote:
artist wrote:
"Nico Schuyt" wrote
Three drafts for a new site.
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm
(But maybe they are *all* ugly :-)

I would have to say number two. The buttons on 1 and 3 look like
stock buttons out of some bad wysiwig editor.

No wonder since I use FronPage :-)
But the number 2 is my favourite two for a start.
Thanks, Nico
Nothing wrong with that, despite what the pundits here may think.
If there wasn't a demand for it, nobody would be using given how
horribly it writes code.



--
AIM: GCCFurryBoy
mellorya (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
http://www.practialdesigns.com/blog/


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
Bonnie Granat
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 07:17 PM



"Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Three drafts for a new site. (Pictures will be replaced by better ones)
Which one is the most attractive in your opinion?
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm
(But maybe they are *all* ugly :-)
Regards, Nico
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm

The name looks best there. I'd like to see the beige background, though.


Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-15-2004 , 02:15 AM



Bonnie Granat wrote:
Thanks Bonnie.
About the background: We'll probably end up in something totally different
:-)
Arrrrghh, I sometimes *hate* this design work. It's allways far more work
(for me) to make a design than to build the whole site.
Nico




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.