HighDots Forums  

Attractive?

Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews Discuss and review existing WWW material (alt.html.critique)


Discuss Attractive? in the Websites/HTML pages critique & reviews forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 03:24 AM






artist wrote:
Quote:
"Nico Schuyt" wrote
Three drafts for a new site.
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm
(But maybe they are *all* ugly :-)

I would have to say number two. The buttons on 1 and 3 look like stock
buttons out of some bad wysiwig editor.
No wonder since I use FronPage :-)
But the number 2 is my favourite two for a start.
Thanks, Nico




Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 03:30 AM






Barefoot Kid wrote:
Quote:
"Nico Schuyt"
Three drafts for a new site.
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm

well they r not ugly but they're not exactly attractive either, just
very, very basic,
I love basic sites :-) But, compared with that beautiful
www.intro-spect.co.uk it's very dull indeed :-)
(Some day I'll use the effect with those sharp/unsharp pictures)

Quote:
if i had to go for 1 then i'd say the 2nd design i
Thanks, Nico





Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 03:32 AM



Ian Miller wrote:
Maybe you mean the second one? (The buttons on the third one are equal to
the first)
Nico




Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 03:32 AM



jake wrote:
I agree.
Thanks, Nico




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
picayunish
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 06:03 AM



Nico Schuyt wrote:
Quote:
picayunish wrote:

Nico Schuyt wrote:

Three drafts for a new site. (Pictures will be replaced by better
ones) Which one is the most attractive in your opinion?
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm


index2.
Could you give me the address of Roozenduin.
I need a holiday.


At your age you're supposed do something more spectacular in your holidays
than staying in an appartment at the coast :-)
Doh.
--
Edwin van der Vaart
http://www.semi-conductor.nl/ Links to Semiconductors sites
http://www.evandervaart.nl/ Under construction


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Terry Kimpling
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 08:16 AM



"Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Terry Kimpling wrote:
Nico Schuyt wrote
Three drafts for a new site. (Pictures will be replaced by better
ones) Which one is the most attractive in your opinion?
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm
(But maybe they are *all* ugly :-)

I like the third one best<grin>noticed the pop-up pictures do not
have their alt tags filled out</grin> Oh, the shame.

No alt tags! A shame indeed :-) But *where* did you see that (AFAIK I
applied everywhere alt="", except for the logo)
"not have their alt tags filled out" = empty
(Not equal to) No alt tags.
You know a joke is really bad when you have to explain it!
TK

--
www.wejuggle2.com
Still Having a Ball




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Barefoot Kid
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 08:20 AM



"Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Barefoot Kid wrote:
"Nico Schuyt"
Three drafts for a new site.
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index2.htm
http://www.nicoschuyt.nl/roozenduin/index3.htm

well they r not ugly but they're not exactly attractive either, just
very, very basic,

I love basic sites :-) But, compared with that beautiful
www.intro-spect.co.uk it's very dull indeed :-)
(Some day I'll use the effect with those sharp/unsharp pictures)
copycat
---------------------------------------------------
Hung Diep
New Media Designer
www.intro-spect.co.uk
0795 6576 319




Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Daniel Ruscoe
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 10:36 AM



In article <5gpXb.10899$ul3.10773 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk>,
Barefoot Kid says...
Quote:
"Nico Schuyt" <nschuyt (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:402ddb73$0$93699$cd19a363 (AT) news (DOT) wanadoo.nl...

| I love basic sites :-) But, compared with that beautiful
| www.intro-spect.co.uk it's very dull indeed :-)
| (Some day I'll use the effect with those sharp/unsharp pictures)

copycat
You know what they say, imitation is sincerest form of theft

--
Daniel Ruscoe
http://www.brakedisc.net


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Nico Schuyt
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 01:48 PM



Safalra wrote:
Quote:
Nico Schuyt wrote

www.intro-spect.co.uk
(Some day I'll use the effect with those sharp/unsharp pictures)

Ugh - the blurring when I move off an image makes my eyes water...

--- Safalra (Stephen Morley) ---
http://www.safalra.com/hyperpext
Hehehe, I can imagine you say that. In comparison with your
http://www.safalra.com even my (basic) sites must upset you :0
Nico




Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Els
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Attractive? - 02-14-2004 , 01:52 PM



Safalra wrote:

Quote:
--- Safalra (Stephen Morley) ---
http://www.safalra.com/hyperpext
eh.. sure you don't mean hypertext?

--
Els

Mente humana é como pára-quedas; funciona melhor aberta.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.