![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
The navigation pages... http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net/ |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've redesigned my entire web site with the goal of it being an XHTML eReader. I want to present, for display and print, very good to excellent typography. Of course, this implies very good standards compliance. So, I've targeted IE 6, Mozilla, Netscape 7, FireFox 1, and Opera 7. I have not been able to view my pages from a Mac in months. OBTW, XHTML 1.0 and CSS2 is the level I'm employing. Any and all input is welcome and hopefully I can get this site somewhat stable so I can concentrate on developing more content and less juggling of XHTML and CSS. ;-) The design is basically in two sections. The first section is the 'catalog' pages that are intended to provide quick access to the 'books' or 'documents' as it were. I went for the look of a leather-bound cover to contrast the catalog with the content. The second section is the documents themselves which are designed to give the look and feel of a book in portrait and sometimes landscape mode. These content pages are there primarily for reading; so I have given a lot of attention to readability. The navigation pages... http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net/ You may want to examine this document in particular for my treatment of equations, footnotes, and figures... http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast....elativity.html Thanks in advance... Rich Last year, I did some similar work. http://swnews.net/besant-yoga/1-6.html |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
The leather-book-cover-like texture behind the yellow text needs less contrast within the textures. Darken it, too. Even if the red-green texture is at low saturation, the idea of putting complementary mixed colors behind text makes me a little queasy. Maybe you should try to push the colors more just to greens or just to reds. |
|
Validator Error Target: http://richardrplourde.home.comcast.net/ Please, validate your XML document first! Line 1 Column 1 Content is not allowed in prolog. All of which makes it sound worse than it is -- it really isn't bad. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Last year, I did some similar work. http://swnews.net/besant-yoga/1-6.html |
|
One thing I noticed about your site was you specified utf-8, but used html long-hand 'entities' such as “ and — . Utf-8 character set supports displaying those characters exactly as you key them in, “ ” — as long as you have a text editor that supports utf-8. I think you could do your footnotes with text-decoration: none; and the reader would still figure out they were linkage. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'll work on the contrast of the colors some more but I think if it looks the same as gold leaf looks on bound leather it'll be fine. After all... I'm only trying to emulate the real world. ;-) If it looks like crap in some cases then I'll work those quirks out. but... I don't want it to look like a cartoon either just so that it is absolutely positively not in the least bit challenging. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
| http://www.alistapart.com/d/imagemap/example2.html Notice how that, even though there is mottled textures in the background, he keeps it from behind the text. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I've redesigned my entire web site with the goal of it being an XHTML eReader. I want to present, for display and print, very good to excellent typography. Of course, this implies very good standards compliance. So, I've targeted IE 6, Mozilla, Netscape 7, FireFox 1, and Opera 7. I have not been able to view my pages from a Mac in months. OBTW, XHTML 1.0 and CSS2 is the level I'm employing. Any and all input is welcome and hopefully I can get this site somewhat stable so I can concentrate on developing more content and less juggling of XHTML and CSS. ;-) The design is basically in two sections. The first section is the 'catalog' pages that are intended to provide quick access to the 'books' or 'documents' as it were. I went for the look of a leather-bound cover to contrast the catalog with the content. The second section is the documents themselves which are designed to give the look and feel of a book in portrait and sometimes landscape mode. These content pages are there primarily for reading; so I have given a lot of attention to readability. The navigation pages... http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast.net/ You may want to examine this document in particular for my treatment of equations, footnotes, and figures... http://RichardRPlourde.home.comcast....elativity.html Thanks in advance... Rich |
#9
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
|
Just a few comments: (a) The site suffers from a 'flash of unstyled content' for all pages when using IE6. In other words, when you go to a new page, for about a second the page can be seen without the stylesheet being applied. This is caused by using @import to reference the stylesheets. Inserting a reference to a basic or empty stylesheet (without using @import) prior to the existing ones should cure this. |
|
(b) You've concentrated on display and print -- but what about speech? Three suggestions: i. With the poems (and possibly other cases) the anchor needs to be on the heading, otherwise the first thing that a person hears is 'return to top'. http://www.gododdin.demon.co.uk/ng/RP01X.JPG (49k) |
|
ii. Check the punctuation http://www.gododdin.demon.co.uk/ng/RP02X.JPG (56k) |
|
iii. Set the alternative text to 'null' to prevent them being spoken http://www.gododdin.demon.co.uk/ng/RP01X.JPG (49k) and http://www.gododdin.demon.co.uk/ng/RP04X.JPG (48k) |
|
(c) Some of the pages could do with more space between image and text: http://www.gododdin.demon.co.uk/ng/RP03X.JPG (47k) |
|
(d) More testing? http://www.gododdin.demon.co.uk/ng/RP07X.JPG (29k) |
|
All-in-all, it's a very attractive site -- although some people would argue that the use of a serif font and right justified body for screen display is not a good idea. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
jake wrote: [snip] |
|
I'd like to know if you can tell me if there is software that I could use to "LISTEN" to my site to hear where I need to fix things? |
|
All-in-all, it's a very attractive site -- although some people would argue that the use of a serif font and right justified body for screen display is not a good idea. Thanks a lot for the comments and compliments I have tried to make simplicity be the watchword for the site... simple but elegant... ;-) The site isn't about those graphics in the poetry and hometown sections. I could just as easily rip them right out if they are going to clog up the works. The reason for the site is in the other sections; the books and documents are what I want to celebrate with the 'look and feel' they deserve. I want them to be approachable and effortlessly readable. I want the site to present this material with typography which will allow a visitor an environment which is conducive with reading the whole book on my web site. I want them to find that they can comfortably get into 'a zone' and zip right through the material be it a murder mystery or physics thesis. I plan on placing more public domain fiction as well as treatments of many other topics. As far as the serif font, I think it is fine. Daily I read the NY Times online and I find their use of the Times Roman font unfortunate (it was designed for print NOT display) and they've, also, set it too small. I know my use of Georgia is correct for display and the size is bigger and better along with more correct letterspacing and linespacing. OBTW, "Times Roman" is specified for print, which is, again, the correct use for it. Although, I still need to tune the print stylesheet. I really know that there will be trade-offs all around but I am shooting for the best presentation of the material that can be expected. Sans serif is NOT the best for the display of prose. If they (the user) don't, won't or can't tolerate a serif font they can specify whichever they like and they will always get their choice rather than my "font suggestions". They just select a 'sans serif' font in place whatever they would have gotten when 'serif' is specified. Am I not right in this??? Besides, if I had selected a sans serif font it would probably be Verdana which was specifically designed for display and looks great... but everybody 'cries' IT'S TOO BIG ! ! ! WAAAAAHHHH ! ! ! ;-) Yes, I think that Georgia is a good choice for these pages (it's my |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |