What do you think?

What do you think of this site? http://www.wickedinnovations.com/

Any suggestion?

Thanks

Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

What do you think of this site? http://www.wickedinnovations.com/

Any suggestion?

Thanks

I'm getting a 500 error - do you have a local copy to post for us to see?

--
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendan \removethis// gillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E265E61

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Brendan Gillatt wrote:

Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
What do you think of this site? h x x p://www. wickedinnovations. com/

Any suggestion?

Yes, stop spamming your worthless junk.

Thanks

You are most welcome.

I'm getting a 500 error - do you have a local copy to post for us to see?

You were lucky. <g> This wickedinnovations spams his/her crap site
frequently. The post was not a "design" question.

Ah thanks - killfile.

--
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendan \removethis// gillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E265E61

On 2006-11-24, Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

What do you think of this site? http://www.wicked............com/

A fine example of how *not* to create a website.

--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

The server has a problem when you visit our site. But it's ok now. You
can visit it again.

Thanks

On Nov 24, 10:46 pm, "Jenna0... (AT) gmail (DOT) com" <Jenna0... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

The server has a problem when you visit our site. But it's ok now. You
can visit it again.

Thanks

I'm not spamming. I'm asking what do you think of the design of that
site.

Thanks

On 2006-11-25, Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

On Nov 24, 10:46 pm, "Jenna0... (AT) gmail (DOT) com" <Jenna0... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
The server has a problem when you visit our site. But it's ok now. You
can visit it again.

Thanks

I'm not spamming. I'm asking what do you think of the design of that
site.

What site is that?

You are posting to Usenet, not Google Groups, and other people may
not have access to the post to which you are replying. The Usenet
convention is to include enough context from previous posts that
back references are not required.

--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

What do you think of this site? http://www.wickedinnovations.com/

- No DTD (doctype). Use HTML Strict.

- 37 HTML validation errors (52 using HTML Strict)
<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wickedinnovat ions.com%2F>
- Full justification on narrow columns. Looks hokey.
- Primitive table-base layout.
- The primary navigation is a Flash thingy, thus no navigation without
Flash. A secondary nav menu is tacked away at the bottom.

- The site is hardly innovative, much less wicked. It is simply yet
another attempt to copy print advertising to the Web with the usual lack
of success.

--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)

Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

What do you think of this site? http://www.wickedinnovations.com/

Any suggestion?

Thanks

Jenna,

I think you would benefit from reading
http://pages.prodigy.net/chris_beall/TC/index.html, especially the parts
on Bandwidth, DOCTYPE, Font size, Text in images, and Flash.

And I second the comment about left-right justified text.

You need to have someone go over the English and clean it up. It reads
like something generated by a buzzword algorithm.

Why would I care that you are in the Philippines? And "Offshore"?

The Testimonials page has nice words from a bunch of folks I don't know.
I'd rather see links to sites you have completed, so I can judge your
work for myself.

I was going to apply for a career position, but then I read that "All
applications are pre-screened based on academic credentials." I'd never
make the cut.

Interesting that the key skills for "Web Designer" don't include CSS.

That all sounds rather negative, so I should mention that, if I saw your
home page printed on a glossy brochure, I'd probably pick it up. Nice
colors, grid spacing, etc., hence a nice visual appearance from a distance.

And I don't think you're spamming. Insensitive, perhaps. But that's
just my opinion. (Now the guy that keeps trying to do header insertion
on one of my sites, in order to tell the world about bacon, that's
spamming...)

Chris Beall

Jenna0109 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

What do you think of this site? http://www.wickedinnovations.com/

Any suggestion?

Have meaningful TITLE attributes on your different pages (which appear
in browser history menus and bookmarks, etc.) instead of meaningless
marketing gobbledygook.

http://webtips.dan.info/titles.html

--
Dan