Need opinion on design of this site...

http://www.wrestlerratings.34sp.com/index.php

Thanks,

Gater wrote:

http://www.wrestlerratings.34sp.com/index.php

Thanks,

It's certainly an improvement on you're old style.
I would loose the background image - it's a bit straining on the eyes.
You also use a few formating tags such as <B> which are depreciated in
favor of CSS (as well as being upper-case). Use a <span> tag with
appropriate formatting.

--

Brendan Gillatt |
brendan {at} brendan \removethis// gillatt {dot} co {dot} uk |
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk |
PGP Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E265E61|

Brendan Gillatt <brendan (AT) brendanREMOVETHISgillatt (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

You also use a few formating tags such as <B> which are depreciated in
favor of CSS (as well as being upper-case).

Maybe you no longer "appreciate" the <b> element, I can assure you that
it has not been *deprecated*. There are instances where using the
element is perfectly appropriate.

Use a <span> tag with
appropriate formatting.

Which, contrary to use of the <b> element, is rarely a good solution.

--
Spartanicus

Spartanicus wrote:

Brendan Gillatt <brendan (AT) brendanREMOVETHISgillatt (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

You also use a few formating tags such as <B> which are depreciated in
favor of CSS (as well as being upper-case).

Maybe you no longer "appreciate" the <b> element, I can assure you that
it has not been *deprecated*. There are instances where using the
element is perfectly appropriate.

Use a <span> tag with
appropriate formatting.

Which, contrary to use of the <b> element, is rarely a good solution.

Sorry if I was wrong but I was under the impression it was - meh. I
thought the idea was to off load the presentation of the document to CSS.

--

Brendan Gillatt |
brendan {at} brendan \removethis// gillatt {dot} co {dot} uk |
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk |
PGP Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E265E61|

Brendan Gillatt <brendan (AT) brendanREMOVETHISgillatt (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Maybe you no longer "appreciate" the <b> element, I can assure you that
it has not been *deprecated*. There are instances where using the
element is perfectly appropriate.

Use a <span> tag with
appropriate formatting.

Which, contrary to use of the <b> element, is rarely a good solution.


Sorry if I was wrong but I was under the impression it was - meh. I
thought the idea was to off load the presentation of the document to CSS.

It is, but there is also the need for a document to work without CSS.

Occasionally the visual representation of a document rendered sans CSS
can be improved by using the <b> element around content which cannot
justifiably be marked up as a header or as having emphasis, this can
justify using the <b> element with content.

Then there are situations where an empty hook in the HTML is needed to
attach styling properties to, for that purpose there is nothing wrong
with using <b></b> or <i></i> instead of <span></span> or <div></div>.

Finally <span class="foo">foo</span> with .foo{font-weight:bold} is no
less presentational markup than <b>foo</b>, it just wastes more bits.

--
Spartanicus

Really?
Not good.
What need?
1. In FireFox your site moved left, so margin-left = 0 px, margin-right
somthing like 25px. Site not centered.
2. Gradient in header not good idea.
3. Colors for figthings need more extremely, not so pastel.
4. Quality of fighter's sihluettes is bad. Much sharp.
5. Colors-colors-colors.
6. Rating table rows height need some less = 20-22px. Checkbox must be
align=center and valign=middle.

Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Russia.