My site, your opinion

On 2004-05-18 00:17:46 +0200, Lauri Raittila <lauri (AT) raittila (DOT) cjb.net> said:

Why 400px min-width? Someone using 10px fonts could fit it on his/her
page. In fact, I just read on Finnish newsgroup about someone who is
using even smaller fonts. (on 15" / 1600*1200, which I find hard to
believe!). And OTOH, someone using big fonts gets your long words
overflowing to right navigation column.

Do I understand what you mean: You want me to change the min-width on
em-size, right?

M

Michael Kalina wrote:

On 2004-05-18 00:17:46 +0200, Lauri Raittila <lauri (AT) raittila (DOT) cjb.net> said:

Do I understand what you mean: You want me to change the min-width on
em-size, right?

Yes.

--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
I'm looking for work | Etsin työtä

On 2004-05-18 20:22:03 +0200, Lauri Raittila <lauri (AT) raittila (DOT) cjb.net> said:

Michael Kalina wrote:
On 2004-05-18 00:17:46 +0200, Lauri Raittila <lauri (AT) raittila (DOT) cjb.net> said:

Do I understand what you mean: You want me to change the min-width on
em-size, right?

Yes.

Better now?