MSTC website

Hi guys

we made a little simple website,
I'd apprechiate if someone will test it with browsers not-IE.

thanks for reviews, link in sign


--
N! Xau - sovrintendente agli antani upgradati

la sede del Movimento Salvaguardia e Tutela Cazzate:
http://ilovemiliofede.altervista.org

On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:17:27 +0100, N! Xau <nxauNO_SPAM_PLEASE (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Hi guys

How do you do?

we made a little simple website,
I'd apprechiate if someone will test it with browsers not-IE.

ok - with full on shields-up filters set for accessibility testing all I
see is "La pagina corrente utilizza i frame. Questa caratteristica non è
supportata dal browser in uso."

You are not alone ...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...upport+them%22

--
William Tasso

"William Tasso" <SpamBlocked (AT) tbData (DOT) com> ha scritto nel messaggio

ok - with full on shields-up filters set for accessibility testing all I
see is "La pagina corrente utilizza i frame. Questa caratteristica non è
supportata dal browser in uso."

You use Opera, right?
What if you switch your filters set from "shield-up" to "ordinary browsing"?


THX

N! Xau wrote:

What if you switch your filters set from "shield-up" to "ordinary
browsing"?

You asked for reviews in a newsgroup about accessibility - it isn't
accessible. Why not fix that before worrying about "ordinary" browsers?

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

"David Dorward" <dorward (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:d0fd1j$fu2$1

You asked for reviews in a newsgroup about accessibility - it isn't
accessible.

It isn't accessible, with Opera set to shield-up.

Why not fix that before worrying about "ordinary" browsers?

See above. Maybe it's accessible for 95% of the browsers with common
settings.


--
N! Xau - sovrintendente agli antani upgradati

la sede del Movimento Salvaguardia e Tutela Cazzate:
http://ilovemiliofede.altervista.org

N! Xau wrote:

You asked for reviews in a newsgroup about accessibility - it isn't
accessible.

It isn't accessible, with Opera set to shield-up.

Which simple means disabling certain features - such as frames (and thus
displaying the alternative content - which, in your case, sucks).

Why not fix that before worrying about "ordinary" browsers?

See above. Maybe it's accessible for 95% of the browsers with common
settings.

Its not difficult to get 100% accessibility. I suggest you take a read of
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/


--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

"David Dorward" <dorward (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:d0fjr4$csc$1

It isn't accessible, with Opera set to shield-up.

Which simple means disabling certain features - such as frames (and thus
displaying the alternative content - which, in your case, sucks).

Honestly, I don't particularly care to address my websites to people whose
browsers can't even display a page with frames.

Its not difficult to get 100% accessibility. I suggest you take a read of
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/

How long d'ya think those rules will be still valid, before a new IE release
overrides them?


--
N! Xau - sovrintendente agli antani upgradati

la sede del Movimento Salvaguardia e Tutela Cazzate:
http://ilovemiliofede.altervista.org

N! Xau wrote:

"David Dorward" <dorward (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:d0fjr4$csc$1
It isn't accessible, with Opera set to shield-up.

Which simple means disabling certain features - such as frames (and thus
displaying the alternative content - which, in your case, sucks).


Honestly, I don't particularly care to address my websites to people whose
browsers can't even display a page with frames.

Which means that you don't care about whether your site is accessible.
So why are you asking for opinions in this newsgroup?

Its not difficult to get 100% accessibility. I suggest you take a read of
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/

How long d'ya think those rules will be still valid, before a new IE release
overrides them?

Where do you get the idea that IE overrides web standards?

"Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger.removethis (AT) comcast (DOT) net> ha scritto nel
messaggio

Which means that you don't care about whether your site is accessible.

Wrong deduction. That means I care it's accessible for most of the users.

So why are you asking for opinions in this newsgroup?

Can't I?


--
N! Xau - sovrintendente agli antani upgradati

la sede del Movimento Salvaguardia e Tutela Cazzate:
http://ilovemiliofede.altervista.org

N! Xau wrote:

"Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger.removethis (AT) comcast (DOT) net> ha scritto nel
messaggio


Which means that you don't care about whether your site is accessible.


Wrong deduction. That means I care it's accessible for most of the users.

You seem to be unaware of the sense of the word "accessibility" as used
in the context of in user interface design. It's concerned with the
ability of users *outside* the "most of the users" category to use an
interface (web site, etc.). That includes users who work with text-based
browsers, Braille readers, speech synthesizers, and so forth, which may
not have frames support at all.

So why are you asking for opinions in this newsgroup?

Can't I?

Sure. Just as, if you're Christian, you *can* seek spiritual guidance
from a rabbi or an imam. However, you *shouldn't* if you're going to
become indignant when the responses are given (as they will be) in a
Jewish or Muslim context rather than a Christian one.