When does Google reevaluate PR?

My site has not been up long at my new web address. My previous url
that lasted several years died a no-traffic death.

It has been listed by Google.

How often does Google reassign PR ranks?

Thanks.

<a href="http://www.copy-writer.us>Copywriter</a>

"Grant" <fgea-ifvt (AT) spamex (DOT) com> wrote

My site has not been up long at my new web address. My previous url
that lasted several years died a no-traffic death.

It has been listed by Google.

How often does Google reassign PR ranks?

Thanks.

a href="http://www.copy-writer.us>Copywriter</a

FYI, since you posted in plaintext, your sig's anchor tag won't parse out.
Plus you forgot the ending quote. ;-)

Rick

Grant wrote:

My site has not been up long at my new web address. My previous url
that lasted several years died a no-traffic death.

It has been listed by Google.

How often does Google reassign PR ranks?

Probably monthly or even continuously as they spider but the toolbar PR
is only sporadically updated.

David

----------------------
http://www.abcseo.com/

Richard S. Westmoreland wrote:

"Grant" <fgea-ifvt (AT) spamex (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:67p041l7v52mrfre6r7cdl9non2osrvtq3 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
My site has not been up long at my new web address. My previous url
that lasted several years died a no-traffic death.

It has been listed by Google.

How often does Google reassign PR ranks?

Thanks.

a href="http://www.copy-writer.us>Copywriter</a

FYI, since you posted in plaintext, your sig's anchor tag won't parse
out. Plus you forgot the ending quote. ;-)

I am not going to suggest a validator, no, I am not.

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

Grant wrote:

My site has not been up long at my new web address. My previous url
that lasted several years died a no-traffic death.

It has been listed by Google.

How often does Google reassign PR ranks?

Thanks.

I estimated this to be about 3 months, but nobody knows for sure. Google
aspiration is to decrease this frequency and they probably do. One day they
hope to crawl the entire Web (and update indices) every single day. I am
sceptic about it because the Web is growing far too quickly to conquer.

http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/03/04/google-refresh-cycles/

Roy

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

One day they hope to crawl the entire Web (and update indices) every
single day. I am sceptic about it because the Web is growing far too
quickly to conquer.

But how fast will it keep on growing? Also, how many people will stay on
the net? Isn't there already a huge graveyard of sites?

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

John Bokma wrote:

But how fast will it keep on growing?

In terms of space -- greatly. Storage becomes cheaper and cheaper. I get
half a gig with my current hosts. This means that more people will upload
extensive galleries and even videos. Google already intend to index videos
somehow.

Also, how many people will stay on
the net? Isn't there already a huge graveyard of sites?

I sometimes wonder if there will be an 'Internet anticlimax'. Maybe, just
maybe, people will wake up some day and realise that all remains the same
in cyberspace. People might come outside and appreciate nature as if it
were the greatest IMAX picture. Talking to people will suddenly appear like
a much richer experience than instant messaging.

Roy

--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

John Bokma wrote:

But how fast will it keep on growing?

In terms of space -- greatly. Storage becomes cheaper and cheaper. I
get half a gig with my current hosts. This means that more people will
upload extensive galleries and even videos. Google already intend to
index videos somehow.

Yup, like pictures now, probably at the same speed (read: very slow)

Also, how many people will stay on
the net? Isn't there already a huge graveyard of sites?

I sometimes wonder if there will be an 'Internet anticlimax'. Maybe,
just maybe, people will wake up some day and realise that all remains
the same in cyberspace.

Yup, I am afraid it will happen, people get bored with running blogs,
and moreover reading blogs :-D.

People might come outside and appreciate
nature as if it were the greatest IMAX picture. Talking to people will
suddenly appear like a much richer experience than instant messaging.

I can tell that IM adds an extra dimension to once live, but it's not a
replacement of.

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html

John Bokma wrote:

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

John Bokma wrote:

But how fast will it keep on growing?

In terms of space -- greatly. Storage becomes cheaper and cheaper. I
get half a gig with my current hosts. This means that more people will
upload extensive galleries and even videos. Google already intend to
index videos somehow.

Yup, like pictures now, probably at the same speed (read: very slow)

Yes, it grabs just a fraction and takes many months to re-index.

Also, how many people will stay on
the net? Isn't there already a huge graveyard of sites?

I sometimes wonder if there will be an 'Internet anticlimax'. Maybe,
just maybe, people will wake up some day and realise that all remains
the same in cyberspace.

Yup, I am afraid it will happen, people get bored with running blogs,
and moreover reading blogs :-D.

I already am (bored with blogs, as well as news).

People might come outside and appreciate
nature as if it were the greatest IMAX picture. Talking to people will
suddenly appear like a much richer experience than instant messaging.

I can tell that IM adds an extra dimension to one's life, but it's not a
replacement of.

BTW, Thanks for gsuggest.pl which I have just downloaded. Some of the other
scripts no longer work. Let me know if you want to hear about it...

Roy

--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

John Bokma wrote:
[ Google ]

Yup, like pictures now, probably at the same speed (read: very slow)

Yes, it grabs just a fraction and takes many months to re-index.

Yeah, I am still thinking if I keep allowing it, or put the bot in my
robots.txt :-D.

( BTW, Today I got the Google which shows pics on top :-D )

Yup, I am afraid it will happen, people get bored with running blogs,
and moreover reading blogs :-D.

I already am (bored with blogs, as well as news).

:-D. Yeah I read a lot of news (mainly slashdot) and often wonder: there
was a time I didn't do this, and what did I miss?

BTW, Thanks for gsuggest.pl which I have just downloaded. Some of the
other scripts no longer work. Let me know if you want to hear about
it...

You're welcome. And yes, I want to hear. I know that the pagerank script
doesn't work anymore. I do my best to upload this week a replacement.

Suggestions / requests etc. are also welcome (I sometimes run out of
small ideas, and get big ones instead which often take too much time)

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html