![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
My site (www.traditions.com) used to show up on google quite well. Now, it is virtually invisible. I tried searching google on traditions.com to see what other sites linked to me and none were listed. However, I am linked to by other sites (e.g. http://www.fifthavenuesouth.com/specialty_stores.php) that are included in the google index. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Thanks, |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mike Schumann wrote: My site (www.traditions.com) used to show up on google quite well. Now, it is virtually invisible. I tried searching google on traditions.com to see what other sites linked to me and none were listed. However, I am linked to by other sites (e.g. http://www.fifthavenuesouth.com/specialty_stores.php) that are included in the google index. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Thanks, Hi, I'm not sure but shit happens |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jean-Marc Langevin" <jmarc (AT) k3-media (DOT) com> wrote in message news:rguDf.2948$Sk1.88980 (AT) news20 (DOT) bellglobal.com... Mike Schumann wrote: My site (www.traditions.com) used to show up on google quite well. Now, it is virtually invisible. I tried searching google on traditions.com to see what other sites linked to me and none were listed. However, I am linked to by other sites (e.g. http://www.fifthavenuesouth.com/specialty_stores.php) that are included in the google index. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Thanks, Hi, I'm not sure but shit happens You use frames which is not a good idea. It is complicated and search engines may not navigate successfully. Check your logs to see if Google can navigate your site successfully. Each time I call one of your individual htm files it goes straight back to the index page. You seem to have some redirect(s) in action and this kind of trick may make it look like you have many different page names, all with the same content. Avoid hidden text. Since all your index page text is completely hidden you very definitely appear to be spamming. I can't see any text on the screen corresponding the four text paragraphs of <body> content of the index page. It would be wise also to avoid microscopic unreadable text and semi-invisible dark purple text on black background. It looks like you are trying to hide something. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Eric Johnston" <nospam (AT) redyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:T9xDf.40682$mu.40077 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk... "Jean-Marc Langevin" <jmarc (AT) k3-media (DOT) com> wrote in message news:rguDf.2948$Sk1.88980 (AT) news20 (DOT) bellglobal.com... Mike Schumann wrote: My site (www.traditions.com) used to show up on google quite well. Now, it is virtually invisible. I tried searching google on traditions.com to see what other sites linked to me and none were listed. However, I am linked to by other sites (e.g. http://www.fifthavenuesouth.com/specialty_stores.php) that are included in the google index. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Thanks, Hi, I'm not sure but shit happens You use frames which is not a good idea. It is complicated and search engines may not navigate successfully. Check your logs to see if Google can navigate your site successfully. Each time I call one of your individual htm files it goes straight back to the index page. You seem to have some redirect(s) in action and this kind of trick may make it look like you have many different page names, all with the same content. Avoid hidden text. Since all your index page text is completely hidden you very definitely appear to be spamming. I can't see any text on the screen corresponding the four text paragraphs of <body> content of the index page. It would be wise also to avoid microscopic unreadable text and semi-invisible dark purple text on black background. It looks like you are trying to hide something. Let us not ignore the obvious: WHERE'S THE CONTENT? Using frames should not be a problem. I once designed a framed site for PAY but the client was too anxious to wait for the testing to make sure that the SEs were picking it up properly. Framing really isn't such a big deal. Once you get into it....it CAN BE FUN. But not something you'll remember so quickly. I'd have to spend a full 3-4 days just to get back into it myself. AS FOR CONTENT?....well, where was it? there's no content on this site. If there is then there's damned little of it. Dude, if this site did show up well within Google then that would've been a GODSEND. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
The content is: 1. Our locations and hours. 2. A list of the vendors that we carry, along with links to their web sites, where available. 3. A description of our style (essentially a scanned image of our store brochure). The reason we use frames, is so that if you click to one of our manufacturer's, you stay within the frame, instead of totally disappearing off of our site. We certainly aren't intentionally trying to spam google. I'm starting to wonder if maybe their engine hasn't blacklisted us somehow, or if my problems are related to the way our frames work. Any suggestions would be appreciated. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Schumann" <mike-nospam (AT) traditions-nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:tJzDf.2945$Nv2.791 (AT) newsread1 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net... The content is: 1. Our locations and hours. 2. A list of the vendors that we carry, along with links to their web sites, where available. 3. A description of our style (essentially a scanned image of our store brochure). The reason we use frames, is so that if you click to one of our manufacturer's, you stay within the frame, instead of totally disappearing off of our site. We certainly aren't intentionally trying to spam google. I'm starting to wonder if maybe their engine hasn't blacklisted us somehow, or if my problems are related to the way our frames work. Any suggestions would be appreciated. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
"WhoTurnedOffTheLights" <Lights (AT) light0987654321 (DOT) com> wrote in message news:55ADf.3774$UY3.244 (AT) trndny05 (DOT) .. "Mike Schumann" <mike-nospam (AT) traditions-nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:tJzDf.2945$Nv2.791 (AT) newsread1 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net... The content is: 1. Our locations and hours. 2. A list of the vendors that we carry, along with links to their web sites, where available. 3. A description of our style (essentially a scanned image of our store brochure). The reason we use frames, is so that if you click to one of our manufacturer's, you stay within the frame, instead of totally disappearing off of our site. We certainly aren't intentionally trying to spam google. I'm starting to wonder if maybe their engine hasn't blacklisted us somehow, or if my problems are related to the way our frames work. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Mike, LISTEN TO ME. I just realized the obvious. There's NO REASON why your site should be framed. How about finding someone TRUSTWORTHY & HONEST who KNOWS what they're doing to redo your site. Under optimum circumstances your site can be redone in the span of an hour, (2 hours at the most!). It can be redone with everything that you wish and need. So keep that in mind. There's no reason I see why you need a framed site. So when you try to find someone, tell them exactly this: "This site can be redone in less than 2 hours! without frames" Don't get suckered and don't be too stubborn! OKAY? I wish you the best pal. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hold on, he's got a point (with or without content) about Google suddenly dropping him. My site (actually it's a blog) used to rank quite well with Google (for two years), and starting January 23, 2006, Google completely banned/blocked me. All pages, cache, etc. completely gone from Google. Now could it be that I have soft-porn pics on my site and I do write about politics in Hong Kong / China? If so, I seem to be a victim of Google's recent issues with US (porn) and China (censorship/politics). BTW, I live in Hong Kong which is now part of China (though we have different governments and systems), and my site is hosted on Typepad (in US). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |