![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill wrote: http://www.seochat.com/c/a/Search-En...bsite-Ranking/ like much on the Web it is a bit out of date and gives half the picture. |
|
Google can handle dynamic URLs so long as they are consistent and mod-rewrite isn't going to help with those that are not. e.g. www.news-site.com?story=123456&lang=en pulls story keyed by 123456 out of the db and displays the page. Google will not have a problem with this but they claim they spider such sites more slowly so as not put a load on the web server. |
|
Yahoo doesn't seem to have to much problem with dynamic such URLs either, for example guardian.ifyouski.com/community/Vote?template=vote%26ObjectID=147036 |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:33:40 +0100, David Off david.off_dumpthisbit_ (AT) voila (DOT) fr> wrote: |
|
Yahoo doesn't seem to have to much problem with dynamic such URLs either, for example guardian.ifyouski.com/community/Vote?template=vote%26ObjectID=147036 Yes but breadcrumbs again; can engines go deeper in? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:33:40 +0100, David Off david.off_dumpthisbit_ (AT) voila (DOT) fr> wrote: [...] Yahoo doesn't seem to have to much problem with dynamic such URLs either, for example guardian.ifyouski.com/community/Vote?template=vote%26ObjectID=147036 Yes but breadcrumbs again; can engines go deeper in? Can you give an example? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes but breadcrumbs again; can engines go deeper in? Can you give an example? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
but this isn't- domain.com/index.php?variable1=stuff&variable2=stuff2&variabl e3=stuff3 |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 18 Nov 2004 19:05:31 GMT, John Bokma <postmaster (AT) castleamber (DOT) com wrote: Big Bill wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:33:40 +0100, David Off david.off_dumpthisbit_ (AT) voila (DOT) fr> wrote: [...] Yahoo doesn't seem to have to much problem with dynamic such URLs either, for example guardian.ifyouski.com/community/Vote?template=vote%26ObjectID=147036 Yes but breadcrumbs again; can engines go deeper in? Can you give an example? i think maybe I do mean path info. Possibly. Everyone has different names for everything. |
|
Main products>ancillaryproducts>redproducts>redproducts withknobson.htm Like that. How deep into links or paths/whatever will get spidered if they're dynamically created? |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
SEO Dave wrote: but this isn't- domain.com/index.php?variable1=stuff&variable2=stuff2&variabl e3=stuff3 Not spidered at all? I just thougth slower. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 18 Nov 2004 19:05:31 GMT, John Bokma postmasterSP (AT) AMcastleamber (DOT) com> wrote: Yes but breadcrumbs again; can engines go deeper in? Can you give an example? I think Bill is misunderstanding the problem of spiders having problems with URLs with multiple variables and a bot following the navigation system through multiple dynamic pages. Is a link from a dynamic page followed and how deep. Breadcrumbs tends to refer to a bunch of links showing the path you took (or likely took) to get to a page. So if as part of the navigation system page A links to page B which links to page C which links to page D, page D will have links to page A, B and C usually near the top of the page in a line (breadcrumbs of where you have been). I think what Bill is asking is if the pages above are dynamic can spiders follow the deeper links, page B to page C etc... and the answer is yes as long as they can understand the URL. The real question is what type of dynamic URL can Google spider and the answer (the last time I checked) was ones with 2 or less variables. So these are OK- domain.com/index.php?variable1=stuff domain.com/index.php?variable1=stuff&variable2=stuff2 but this isn't- domain.com/index.php?variable1=stuff&variable2=stuff2&variabl e3=stuff3 So two variables are fine, three aren't. David |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |