 | |
site not listed on google
Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
site not listed on google -
05-04-2005
, 08:38 AM
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I recently changed hosting companies and I read somewhere that Google didn't like a site being hosted at two places at the same time |
dead sites lying around but if you have a real domain name that points
to your actual content Google will sort it all out. Removing the noindex
stuff was a good move, if you have IBLs from sites in the Google index
Google (and other SEs) will find you and your site will get into the
index surprisingly quickly.
Google did recently find a very broad patent that hinted they may be
using a lot of age related information. If you have an existing domain
name then this shouldn't cause much in the way of problems but it may
cause issues for new domains (if indeed Google does any of the stuff
they talk about).
David
----------------------
http://www.abcseo.com/
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I recently changed hosting companies and I read somewhere that Google didn't like a site being hosted at two places at the same time, that this could cause not getting indexed. I also somehow had some meta crap in my code, it got in there from using a template, which stated something like meta="robots" NOINDEX. The other day I read that this will keep the spiders from listing one's site. I've since taken this out. How can I straighten this mess out? I don't want to keep submitting because I read that this could be bad news. Before moving it, at one time, my site had a third page listing on Google. Now it has no listing. |
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow">
in the <head> section of any page that you want indexed.
- --
My email address is bogus, do not use it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQnlCN8/fycBOJ+clAQJ3dAf+Kp8fpHI9JpGrteDwfmTr11cahn85sfwo
709HLbPyXs4eZxtxkq/h4yFqXjGnVGyZafzvGHsCubWJTRCWbHLXMKM6Sx29RYSN
KtHEgq1Vv8BBoulDfzHWmR+xfHbwY1EzX5W/3/StGsaI8UneFDtOL6UHtb5b4R/t
kSh2eIowyCl4ONuSthNUIHQZd84N1kwdHLBq6hlfGAEE45y+ZJ XqTiR1TNtrXoNs
XatCNmVxXOGoy5YiCROS6/RdRxAwtV/8NaUvz3sZPfxga0sSJyv9fOYOPB25xz+Q
WjscoYSahKUiPmBL8XeASIynaNqX9klyS4XBSnucJWTqE1zKYW 9gbA==
=yiob
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <zn3ee.7119$Fa.85188 (AT) twister (DOT) southeast.rr.com mrtarheel <tarheel (AT) tarheel (DOT) net> wrote: I recently changed hosting companies and I read somewhere that Google didn't like a site being hosted at two places at the same time, that this could cause not getting indexed. I also somehow had some meta crap in my code, it got in there from using a template, which stated something like meta="robots" NOINDEX. The other day I read that this will keep the spiders from listing one's site. I've since taken this out. How can I straighten this mess out? I don't want to keep submitting because I read that this could be bad news. Before moving it, at one time, my site had a third page listing on Google. Now it has no listing. You would do much better with this: meta name="robots" content="index,follow" in the <head> section of any page that you want indexed. |
by default, you only waste space by telling them to do what they
naturally do anyway.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Google did recently find a very broad patent that hinted they may be |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
You would do much better with this: meta name="robots" content="index,follow" in the <head> section of any page that you want indexed. No you wouldn't, it's useless. Spiders will go anywhere they're able by default, you only waste space by telling them to do what they naturally do anyway. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk seo that watches the river flow... |
good anymore. I can't remember the name, but there is maybe one major SE
still identifying meta tags, according to various articles. I found these
articles while doing a google search for 'meta tags', I believe.
Thanks for the help guys...
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have read several articles saying that the meta tags in general are no good anymore |
if it is available. You can't cheat and try to put keywords in the
description, though -- Google, for example, doesn't appear to index the
description.
RFM
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.