Site banned by Google- reccomend an SEO expert please.

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:54:14 +0100, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2huxae (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

Once again Stacy, I would like to thank you for you help. I am amazed to
the the session ID's when I use the http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not
see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the cookies are disabled.

Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:54:14 +0100, Lampspecs
Lampspecs.2huxae (AT) no-mx (DOT) fo...rdomain.com.au> wrote:

Once again Stacy, I would like to thank you for you help. I am amazed to
the the session ID's when I use the http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not
see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the cookies are disabled.

Borek

Try looking at it in Opera with cookies
switched off.

Tip to OP:
Get Opera, disable cookies, set to author mode
and set to emulate text browser.

--
T.J.
http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory.co.uk

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:24:22 +0100, T.J. <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote:

I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the cookies are disabled.

Try looking at it in Opera with cookies switched off.

Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
With a small typo?

Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:19:14 -0500, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2hv022 (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

Big Bill Wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:22:59 -0500, Lampspecs
Lampspecs.2hudvo (AT) no-mx (DOT) fo...rdomain.com.au> wrote:


I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and
fix
whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.

You could be searching under seo uk, then, or seo services, or seo
consultant. Or Google consultant. Ho hum :-)

My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11
in
Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it
said
that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about
an
hour.

[image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]

I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability.
I
have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and
I
don't want to make the same mistake again.

*Please PM me if you can help.*

Um... testimonials. Odd what people will believe in. Bye then!

BB

I don't really understand this reply. I can find lots of people who
claim to be able to help all of whom would be happy to charge me fees,
but that is not enough. I want to appoint someone with some degree of
certainty that they know what they are doing and are going to get some
results.

So I have asked for a recommendation, what else am I supposed to do. I
have reached the limit of my knowledge trying to fix this site and I
have run out of patience. Peoples livelihoods depend on making this
site work so I have to find a solution.

If you want me to take you on, I could, but I don't have testimonials.
What's already been attempted on the site that you know of?

BB

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:59:33 -0500, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2hujjt (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

Jezsta Web Productions Wrote:

There is no fixing ATM. I have several sites that were in the same
case. I
can't prove right now that they were not shown in the index the first
6
months other than a couple of people I know know about it also. This
is
something you are just going to have to wait for with your site.


I
have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and
I
don't want to make the same mistake again.

Don't blame you!

Stacey

--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

Dear Stacy,


Thanks for taking the trouble to reply it is appreciated. What does ATM
stand for?

At The Moment.

I didn't buy this domain I registered it in about 1996, but it has just
been used as a testing site with no real content.

Mabee I am reading this wrongly, but Google was indexing my site and it
said so on th screen, but very slowley, I only had two pages indexed
until about two weeks ago when it went up to 12 n two days. then all of
a sudden I get the message sayingthat none of my pages are indexed. If I
follow the link "information for Webmasters" it explains Googles design
guidelines and invites me to submit a re-inclusuion request.

Consequently I read this as meaning that whilst it was indexing the
site and had reached the grand total of 12 pages it had decided not to
continue the process because it does not linke my content. Is this
assumung too much?

Probably way too much. You have a new site. You could read my stuff
here www.kruse.co.uk/sandbox.htm which might illuminate things for
you. If people are dependent upon the proceeds from this site for
their livelihoods then really you should have looked before you leapt
here.

Why in the UK? Well because we are using Netsuite and the whole site is
generated by a series of customerisable templates. If there is a problem
and I believe that you think I am possibly being too impatient, then
fixing the site by a corespondence course as against 1/2 a day face to
face round the table did not seem like the best way to go.

The reason I wanted an expert is that I am not sure if the problem is
the code, design or the data content.

If the scenario is as I understand it, the problem is more likely to
be that you're sandboxed. If you get the site tidied up as much as you
can, then maybe you can try to get in Yahoo's directory. If you
succeed, you're in good shape. Get in a few more reputable
directories. Maybe this'll help you get un-sandboxed. Maybe it'll give
you the provenance you need for that.

BB

"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:24:22 +0100, T.J. <no1 (AT) home (DOT) invalid> wrote:

I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the cookies are disabled.

Try looking at it in Opera with cookies switched off.

Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
With a small typo?

Yes, except for the browser type.:-)

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:45:51 +0100, Jezsta Web Productions
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the cookies are disabled.

Try looking at it in Opera with cookies switched off.

Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
With a small typo?

Yes, except for the browser type.:-)

You think it is browser related? I doubt... Cookies are cookies, browsers
are browsers

Borek
--
www.chembuddy.com/?left=BATE&right=pH-calculator
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode
http://www.bpp.com.pl/?left=dysleksja&right=dysleksja
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:45:51 +0100, Jezsta Web Productions
<Please-use-our-contact-form (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the cookies are disabled.

Try looking at it in Opera with cookies switched off.

Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
With a small typo?

Yes, except for the browser type.:-)

You think it is browser related? I doubt... Cookies are cookies, browsers
are browsers

LOL!! Borek you asked if that is what you proposed. I said with a little
joke, yes except for the browser type.:-) Get it? Funny is what it is
suppose to be.

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

I really don't like to see HTML like this:

... style='visibility:hidden' height=0 ..

There may be a legitimate reason for it, but IMO it's quite likely to
generate a false positive for hidden text even if it's actuallz benign.

You have 288 validation errors:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ampspecs.co.uk

At the very least, you should fix the Google verification metatag by
chopping the " /" out of the back.

On 27 Nov 2006 08:21:35 -0800, "Phil Payne"
<phil (AT) isham-research (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

I really don't like to see HTML like this:

.. style='visibility:hidden' height=0 ..

There may be a legitimate reason for it, but IMO it's quite likely to
generate a false positive for hidden text even if it's actuallz benign.

You have 288 validation errors:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ampspecs.co.uk

At the very least, you should fix the Google verification metatag by
chopping the " /" out of the back.

Phil, who was that to?

BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm