![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm seeing some seemingly off-the-wall SERP changes going on. I know that google is in everflux but this is like nothing I have seen. Sites up and down like a dogs dinner (though mine's been fairly stable for the most part). I have been seeing this since the start of Feb - anyone else seeing this? Jez. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:34:41 +0000, Jez <j.ez (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote: I'm seeing some seemingly off-the-wall SERP changes going on. I know that google is in everflux but this is like nothing I have seen. Sites up and down like a dogs dinner (though mine's been fairly stable for the most part). I have been seeing this since the start of Feb - anyone else seeing this? Jez. Hi Jez I have noticed it for 4-5 days now. Minor shifts before that. plh Paul |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
| Paul wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:34:41 +0000, Jez <j.ez (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote: I'm seeing some seemingly off-the-wall SERP changes going on. I know that google is in everflux but this is like nothing I have seen. Sites up and down like a dogs dinner (though mine's been fairly stable for the most part). I have been seeing this since the start of Feb - anyone else seeing this? Jez. Hi Jez I have noticed it for 4-5 days now. Minor shifts before that. plh Paul Yes, it seems to have shifted up a gear or two since the start of the month. Jez. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:30:37 +0000, Jez <j.ez (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote: Paul wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:34:41 +0000, Jez <j.ez (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote: I'm seeing some seemingly off-the-wall SERP changes going on. I know that google is in everflux but this is like nothing I have seen. Sites up and down like a dogs dinner (though mine's been fairly stable for the most part). I have been seeing this since the start of Feb - anyone else seeing this? Jez. Hi Jez I have noticed it for 4-5 days now. Minor shifts before that. plh Paul Yes, it seems to have shifted up a gear or two since the start of the month. Jez. The strangest one I had was for two keywords. Native American Indians American Indians. American Indians dropped out of the picture all together. It wasn't even in the top 887 sites. [Was # 97] Native American Indians dropped 88 to 300 - and later it went to 137 I could have understood it if it were the other way round. plh paul |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes, but more odd than some sites dropping are some of the ones that are rising I think. Some that you would never expect to be top 10 even are top 5. It looks to me like a slight rise of emphasis of on page SEO. No idea why some drop out though. Jez. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:38:53 +0000, Jez <j.ez (AT) virgin (DOT) net> wrote: Yes, but more odd than some sites dropping are some of the ones that are rising I think. Some that you would never expect to be top 10 even are top 5. It looks to me like a slight rise of emphasis of on page SEO. No idea why some drop out though. Jez. I have had some that rose in the stats. But there were some huge drops too. Similar was reported on WMW. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Native American Indians dropped 88 to 300 - and later it went to 137 |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote: Native American Indians dropped 88 to 300 - and later it went to 137 Is there a tool that reports the position or do you manually browse the results? |
|
-mhd |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul <noone (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote: Native American Indians dropped 88 to 300 - and later it went to 137 Is there a tool that reports the position or do you manually browse the results? -mhd |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |