![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill! I can't believe you'd be so aggressive. I'm entirely new to this news group. I've had a look at the FAQ - which hasn't been updated in months - it does not mention you nor does it tell me what 'top posting' is. Why would you think I knew what group etiquette is? Who are you to snipe group etiquette at me? Why would anyone post here if its patrolled with such hostility! |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
I can't believe you'd be so aggressive. I'm entirely new to this news group. I've had a look at the FAQ - which hasn't been updated in months - it does not mention you nor does it tell me what 'top posting' is. |
#13
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Big Bill! I can't believe you'd be so aggressive. |
|
I'm entirely new to this news group. I've had a look at the FAQ - which hasn't been updated in months |
|
- it does not mention you nor does it tell me what 'top posting' is. |
|
Why would you think I knew what group etiquette is? Who are you to snipe group etiquette at me? Why would anyone post here if its patrolled with such hostility! |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:55:00 +0200, Tacila <tacila (AT) hotmail (DOT) co.uk> wrote: I can't believe you'd be so aggressive. I'm entirely new to this news group. I've had a look at the FAQ - which hasn't been updated in months - it does not mention you nor does it tell me what 'top posting' is. It is not about this group etiquette, it is about netiquette. And if you don't know what netiquette is - what are you are doing here? Best, Borek |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:20:59 +0200, Borek m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote: On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:55:00 +0200, Tacila <tacila (AT) hotmail (DOT) co.uk> wrote: I can't believe you'd be so aggressive. I'm entirely new to this news group. I've had a look at the FAQ - which hasn't been updated in months - it does not mention you nor does it tell me what 'top posting' is. It is not about this group etiquette, it is about netiquette. And if you don't know what netiquette is - what are you are doing here? Best, Borek Actually, the FAQ used to mention me, didn't it? Hardly representative of the group if it doesn't mention me at all, is it? BB |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why would you think I knew what group etiquette is? Who are you to snipe group etiquette at me? Why would anyone post here if its patrolled with such hostility! You get told off for top-posting everywhere, not just here and not just by me. Anyhoo, what was your question again? |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
#18
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
Hurmph! I'm pleased David posted and told the rest of you off. He's shown me that there are nice and professional people on this group. |
|
I've looked up "top posting" and now understand the concept. Wikipedia says it is one of a number of styles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting). Some people like it. Some people do not like it. The wikipedia page does not say top posting is banned. The wikipedia page says: "Those who prefer inline replies, on the other hand, are occasionally vocal and "evangelizing" on the subject." I'm used to posting on forums. Forums have FAQs within an easy link of sign up or posting. Usenet does not. |
|
How did anyone expect me to know the term "top post" in order to Google it? On forums when a new person posts they are welcomed, usually, and if they have breached netequitte then they a nicely and politely corrected. |
|
No one would use forums where newbies were descended on with such unwelcome fever. I can handle people who aren't nice. |
|
What surprised and shocked me about my reception on this group is simply how unprofessional the "pack" was. You link to your SEO sites in your posts. Anyone and everyone can see what you just did and they'll know who you are. I doubt many would-be clients will come to your for an introduction to search or training day - they'll fear that if they ask the wrong question that you'll tear their head off. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |