baumgrenze <baumgrenze (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in
news:1b4543c4-8abf-456b-b1d6-62afcc60bcb5 (AT) n20g2000hsh (DOT) googlegroups.com:
Quote:
I gave up searching for a web page dedicated to accepting user
improvement suggestions for Google's basic search engine. All I could
find was a few examples of new apps in beta.
I hope that someone at Google is monitoring this group. |
That would be a surprise
Quote:
I frequently search for scientific and medical information. When I am
in a hurry it would be most helpful if the search results page
contained indicator words to tell me if:
1) access to the linked page is free and complete
2) there is a free abstract but detailed information requires a 'pay
per view' subscription
3) the entire linked page requires payment up front. |
That sounds familiar, I've run into a similar problem when trying to
find answers to software questions... most of the SERPs are places like
expertsexchange that give you a question / teaser and require paid
subscription to actually read the replies.
Quote:
In some instances, it would be even more helpful if there were a
filter setting in 'preferences' that would allow the filtering of
results to block types (3) and or (2) above. |
What I ended up doing was put "-expertsexchange" in the query
--
http://blogdoofus.com