![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...dles/aunt.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo.../daughter.html |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill schreef: We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...dles/aunt.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo.../daughter.html Huh? Ours? Every newsgroup in Google has an xml file ... So you can copy every newsgroup in a site. Or what do you mean? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote: We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? Subscribe to a group or use GG and find a message that's 2-3 days old. Copy a sentence from that article in Google search. A lot of Usenet is copied to sites, some groups pop up on tens of sites. But there is no one place to check this, since a site doing this often picks just a handful of groups that match the theme of the site. IT related groups are very popular of course. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 22 Aug 2006 09:50:55 -0700, "Fikkie" <pascal.beyens (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: Big Bill schreef: We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? BB Huh? Ours? Every newsgroup in Google has an xml file ... So you can copy every newsgroup in a site. Or what do you mean? I want to know which newsgroups people are copying now. I'm thinking of the potential for related backlinks. It would be sensible to post to a newsgroup about fine art with links to some of my poster pages in my sig. I'll get more bang for my buck if the groups are copied as this one is. BB |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 22 Aug 2006 19:10:35 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote: Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote: We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? Subscribe to a group or use GG and find a message that's 2-3 days old. Copy a sentence from that article in Google search. A lot of Usenet is copied to sites, some groups pop up on tens of sites. But there is no one place to check this, since a site doing this often picks just a handful of groups that match the theme of the site. IT related groups are very popular of course. Yeah, but what could I usefully contribute? :-( |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:20:46 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk wrote: On 22 Aug 2006 09:50:55 -0700, "Fikkie" <pascal.beyens (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: Big Bill schreef: We know that ours is, several times over. How might I find out which others are? Aide from joining them all and posting, then searching for dupes of my posts? BB Huh? Ours? Every newsgroup in Google has an xml file ... So you can copy every newsgroup in a site. Or what do you mean? I want to know which newsgroups people are copying now. I'm thinking of the potential for related backlinks. It would be sensible to post to a newsgroup about fine art with links to some of my poster pages in my sig. I'll get more bang for my buck if the groups are copied as this one is. BB Will they - if they aren't already - merely be seen as duplicate content? |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Well they aren't supposed to be ranking for anything themselves, just getting my sites indexed better and puling in visitors from the links themselves. |
|
Follow alt.internet.search-engines threads | with your Firefox Live Bookmarks! Set it up at | http://www.1-script.com/forums/ | +------------------------------------------------+ |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Big Bill wrote: Well they aren't supposed to be ranking for anything themselves, just getting my sites indexed better and puling in visitors from the links themselves. Don't hold your breath, Bill. Any sane administrator of such site would disable the links by at the very least adding the rel="nofollow" attribute. You would not believe what kind of junk people link to in their Usenet posts. Trust me, I know ;-) (see site sig below). Anyways, I have ability to select which ones I want to convert into HTML links, and your main site is actually a link in your messages on my site, but your posters stuff is not. It has been a while since I enabled your links and you are a very prolific poster in a relevant category. So, if you think you did not get any boost from hundreds of links from my site then it means these links probably don't weight too much. What a shame... -- Cheers, Dmitri See Site Sig Below |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |