seo uk

On 13 Nov 2005 22:21:34 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Xns970D9D1541792castleamber (AT) 130 (DOT) 133.1.4...
"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:


Ok, if you can't find it pop me an email and I will tell you how I
found what I found with over 900 links.


Uhm care to share?

It is on a site's navigation bar.

Ah, ok, so a site's navigation bar has links naar BB's site?

Fairly simple to find really. All
you have to do is see some of his BL's on that Google shows and go
from there. It isn't wise to have a link from a nav bar as it puts it
throughout a site or a *particular part* of a sub site. These of
course can make it appear that they are not acquired by hard work like
Google seems to be stemming toward. Links should be done at a slow
pace as several people have done tests with this. Also, his bulk of
related is starting to veer away from what is site is about, making it
hard to pull him into being relevant about SEO.

But it are 900 links from the same site, going to the same page? I don't
see harm in that btw.

I've got a feeling it's one of my sites anyway. But we'll see.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
The buffalo have gone

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:25:36 +0100, Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl>
wrote:

John Bokma wrote:

Ah, ok, so a site's navigation bar has links naar BB's site?

John, ze spreken hier nog niet zoveel Nederlands ;-)

Easy for you to say!

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
The buffalo have gone

Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl> wrote:

John Bokma wrote:
Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl> wrote:
John Bokma wrote:

Ah, ok, so a site's navigation bar has links naar BB's site?

John, ze spreken hier nog niet zoveel Nederlands ;-)

Dan leren ze dat maar :-p

Eén woord per keer zeker? <g

Nee, gelijk diep. Ik bedoel, ze hadden ook geen moeite met Frans :-D.


--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
or have them custom made
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

From a site going to Bill's page. To many I think BTW for Google to
like it isn't like it is his site going to another page on his site
but another site giving him to much at one time to artifical.

So basically I can harm your site with adding just 800 links to your site
from mine? Doubt it.

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
or have them custom made
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:25:36 +0100, Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl
wrote:

John Bokma wrote:

Ah, ok, so a site's navigation bar has links naar BB's site?

John, ze spreken hier nog niet zoveel Nederlands ;-)

Easy for you to say!

True. On the other hand, Else can say that in at least 2 more languages
:-D.

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
or have them custom made
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote

"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

From a site going to Bill's page. To many I think BTW for Google to
like it isn't like it is his site going to another page on his site
but another site giving him to much at one time to artifical.

So basically I can harm your site with adding just 800 links to your site
from mine? Doubt it.

No you didn't read all of what I had said. Bill has to have a link to them
also. I do think that aquiring to many links at one time is artifcial gain
and Google is cutting down on it....because of PR links sale and such. Also
doubting Thomas changed his mind.:-)

Stacey

"Stacey" <stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Xns970DCB30996C1castleamber (AT) 130 (DOT) 133.1.4...
"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

From a site going to Bill's page. To many I think BTW for Google to
like it isn't like it is his site going to another page on his site
but another site giving him to much at one time to artifical.

So basically I can harm your site with adding just 800 links to your
site from mine? Doubt it.

No you didn't read all of what I had said. Bill has to have a link to
them also.

Ah, ok. I still doubt it, though

I do think that aquiring to many links at one time is
artifcial gain and Google is cutting down on it....because of PR links
sale and such. Also doubting Thomas changed his mind.:-)

800+ links from the same site? I doubt that it has a serious impact one
way or the other. E.g. it will probably count as one minus a bit.

--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
or have them custom made
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

John Bokma wrote:

Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:25:36 +0100, Els <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl
wrote:

John Bokma wrote:

Ah, ok, so a site's navigation bar has links naar BB's site?

John, ze spreken hier nog niet zoveel Nederlands ;-)

Easy for you to say!

True. On the other hand, Else can say that in at least 2 more languages
:-D.

Yup. But that's no reason to change my Dutch name into something
English-like ;-)

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Now playing: 2 Unlimited - Nothing Like The Rain (Spanish Version)

On 14 Nov 2005 01:58:30 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

From a site going to Bill's page. To many I think BTW for Google to
like it isn't like it is his site going to another page on his site
but another site giving him to much at one time to artifical.

So basically I can harm your site with adding just 800 links to your site
from mine? Doubt it.

The key difference between that and what Stacey suggests may be
happening is the obl from me to them, whoever they may be, which
implies tacit approval on my part making me a bad guy too.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
The buffalo have gone

On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 03:06:13 +0100, "Stacey"
<stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Xns970DCB30996C1castleamber (AT) 130 (DOT) 133.1.4...
"Stacey" <Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

From a site going to Bill's page. To many I think BTW for Google to
like it isn't like it is his site going to another page on his site
but another site giving him to much at one time to artifical.

So basically I can harm your site with adding just 800 links to your site
from mine? Doubt it.

No you didn't read all of what I had said. Bill has to have a link to them
also. I do think that aquiring to many links at one time is artifcial gain
and Google is cutting down on it....because of PR links sale and such. Also
doubting Thomas changed his mind.:-)

Stacey

I did email you Stacey but heard nothing back. You can just send
straight to me if you wish.

BB

--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
The buffalo have gone