SEO lies was Re: Looking For Links

"David" <seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote

On 11 Aug 2006 08:54:29 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:

Squirm, squirm like the snake that you are goldennippleearringboy.

Goldennippleearringboy Dave is the correct format, remember!

I am thinking DJPB(Damian) moved to Canada. Nah, bleachboy wasn't this bad.

"Jezsta Web Productions" <JezzzStaa (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Yeah I have a screen shot, http://jezsta.com/seo-lies.htm . You want
screen shots of the whole list of sites I listed. Can put them up if
you ned to see them.

Haven't followed much of it, but note that an *update* to a WHOIS record
(or more) can happen for various reasons.

Maybe you can add some text under each screenschot so I have an idea
what's this about?

--
John Experienced Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/

Fart Free Fox: http://johnbokma.com/firefox/find-in-page-sound.html

On 11 Aug 2006 11:05:01 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Jezsta Web Productions wrote:

I noticed that your coniving little punk SEO arses have been hanging
around this thread.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.i...b20f7315a15ae7

I have an idea why you would want to hang out there.

Possibly because there is here - you do realise this is the GG version
of AISE?

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:01:53 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<JezzzStaa (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:qadpd2h7spjvpl0pvlm0o5vemiauef639a (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:31:15 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
JezzzStaa (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1155298382.877286.274300 (AT) m79g2000cwm (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Jezsta Web Productions wrote:

Fred you aren't much of an Expert if you don't know a person can
actually
check the history of the domain. You changed it on the 10th. When I
posted
this link
http://whois.domaintools.com/canadawilds.com at the time I posted all
those
domains they were in your name. Which is why I posted the link to the
domaintools.com. If anyone had a chance to look they would have seen.

there have never been any errors in any logs nor are there any errors
in any logs now

A Basic Rule When Extortioning Expert SEOs

There is no extortion. It is the truth you owned the sites and manipulated
them with anchor text. Something you said you didn't do and was unethical.
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp

This is just Network Solutions, Stacey. It's not about anybody,
there's no url there. So I don't know which domain you're referring
to.

The one that is mentioned above with the domain tools and all of them I
mentioned before hand if you want to look.

even this has the change in
the cache as on the 10th of this month. I have that in those screen shots
also. All someone has to do is:
Scroll Down to see this link:Show underlying registry data for this record
takes you to the other part of the records. What people can't see is the
past history records unless they belong to a registered ICANN whois tool
base.

I got one of those silver memberships but I'm still not sure
specifically what you're referring to. You want to put a screen shot
up somewhere? Then maybe I can do some of my own digging.

Yeah I have a screen shot, http://jezsta.com/seo-lies.htm . You want screen
shots of the whole list of sites I listed. Can put them up if you ned to see
them.

snip
Shoot even Bill
in a way gets Dave going at times.

Me? SEO Dave has been taking wholly unwarranted pops at me for the
past several years. He deserves what he gets.


Oh, so what you are saying is that if someone makes unwarranted pops they
deserve what they get? Well good, because you will notice a piece from
Fred's blog on that page I gave you with the screen shots of where Fred
posted something with me and my on the 5th I brought out the truth. I feel
Fred got what he deserved.


No you just state how good you are at gaining SERPs without manipulating
with links. That is false as you were doing it. In fact it appears you
tell
newbie's not to gain links which their site will fail, to me that is
giving
bad advice. You claim to follow Google's guidelines completely but you
failed here are those sites are closely related even when breaking them up
to French and not. You own those sites, you did change the registration,
some didn't get changed until the 11th though when they made the cache
history.

So you can check into the cache history? What's the point of changing
the history if anyone can see the changes?

The history of the domain, transfers, ip changes, change in hosting etc.
When you purchase a previously owned website you would want to see how the
site was if it was blacklisted by spamhaus or anything else.

I don't know the point of changing history if anyone can see the changes. To
me it was very idiotic of a person to do it and lie about it. But like I
said above a person needs to know all about the site. The same way you can
see who previously own a house, car or any type of property.

So what are you going to do if you find out I am telling the truth about the
domain histories? Keep it to yourself to keep defending Fred for he knows
not what he does for him being unwell, or be a man and state I am telling
the truth?

I never said you weren't telling the truth.

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

On 11 Aug 2006 11:49:27 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

cowards die many times before their deaths
the valiant taste death but only once

What would happen then if there were siamese twins and one was a
coward and one was valiant. How would they die ?
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"John Bokma" <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote

"Jezsta Web Productions" <JezzzStaa (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

Yeah I have a screen shot, http://jezsta.com/seo-lies.htm . You want
screen shots of the whole list of sites I listed. Can put them up if
you need to see them.

Haven't followed much of it, but note that an *update* to a WHOIS record
(or more) can happen for various reasons.

Right which I had stated here earlier - to Bill when he asked:

So you can check into the cache history? What's the point of changing
the history if anyone can see the changes?

I wrote:
"The history of the domain , transfers, ip changes, change in hosting etc.
When you purchase a previously owned website you would want to see how the
site was if it was blacklisted by spamhaus or anything else."

There is more but these are the main reasons.

Maybe you can add some text under each screenshot so I have an idea
what's this about?

Sure (I added al text), get you caught up a little - I posted some domains
that were in Fred's name a couple of days ago to prove a point about links
and ethics. Fred denied owning them then changed the registry and after he
did that stated that I had lied and he wasn't the owner. The date of most of
them has a new history date of the 10th.

Anyway go to the page again as I added a little more to it also to help a
person understand it. I know before I just had the screenshots.:-)

Now to get past history you have to be a member of a registered ICANN
database (that I know of). I tried all of them and couldn't get the past
history before, so I joined domiantools about 5 months ago. I have been
purchasing previously owned domains and wanted to check history. I have also
started checking history to make sure that if I give someone a link that
domain's past has a good history also.

Stacey

"Paul" <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote

On 11 Aug 2006 11:49:27 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:

cowards die many times before their deaths
the valiant taste death but only once

What would happen then if there were siamese twins and one was a
coward and one was valiant. How would they die ?

Be careful Paul, I don't want to see you dragged into this. :-)

Stacey

she's got the screenshots to prove it too, that Fred Joly, he's the
biggest liar

the pen of a deceptive bitch usually speaks less complicated volumes
about truth

Big Bill wrote:

Possibly because there is here - you do realise this is the GG version
of AISE?

I use it