Reference on Fred Joly

Big Bill wrote:

JezzzStaa (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

This bitch Stacey immediately says

"What would be your need to know? Plus are you looking for some SEO or
what?"

Yeah, this posted it after I got your email about your agenda for this
group. Remember that email about you talking how you might go to jail
shortly for beating up or fighting with the cops . Then I was being nice as
I didn't know if this person was wanting to know about your sordid past you
told me about Fred! But now I can see it, and feel you may be totally
insane! You need some help badly.

You only just worked that one out?

snip load of crap from Stacey too

Enough of this already! From both if you!

BB

I agree, Bill.

Stacey, you don't look good by dragging an obviously mentall ill person
through the wringer in public. This is not a schoolyard, where lines
like "seek help immediately" and "are you off your meds?" are used as
arch, cynical put-downs ("Hey, look at me, i took an Introduction to
Psych course!"). Canadafred is obviously suffering from strong feelings
of persecution. The issue is not just that he is calling you names --
the core here is is writing sadly paranoid things like:

A vicious assault is still atking place and turns
its ugly head in many damaging directions to me,
to the co-conspirators and to the industry of SEO as
a whole.

and

I would like to point out that the email posted by
Billy, as a desperation measure of mine in an effort
to terminate embarassing discusions about me online.

and

I found my ass backed into a corner like a spider
and tried to spin my own web to get my ass out of
that posting.

and

for those that haven't a clue what I'm talking about,
the fight against me and a bunch of SEO groupies is
taking place

I cannot help but see a great deal of agitated and disordered thinking
in those extracts, as evidenced by the disordered grammar and syntax.
But you respond to the threat as if it were an organized charcter
assiassination plot, complete with legal threats. I think everyone here
who is used to dealing with logic, even in the abstract sense in which
it is used in programming and SEO, is aware that canadafred has crossed
a line that rational SEO experts do not cross.

Leave it, Stacey. You just look small running after him, extracting
every ounce of blood you can.

And canadafred, please, consider this: your lack of emotional stability
is not going to produce positive results in the professional realm, so
if you can, try to regain your equanimity and let us move on.

Cordially,

Patient cat, not exactly fond of emotional train wrecks.

On 14 Aug 2006 02:53:43 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

GW Bush is getting away with it.
--
Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:58:18 -0700, catherine yronwode
<cat (AT) luckymojo (DOT) com> wrote:

Big Bill wrote:

JezzzStaa (AT) jezsta (DOT) com> wrote:

"canadafred" <canadian_web (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message

This bitch Stacey immediately says

"What would be your need to know? Plus are you looking for some SEO or
what?"

Yeah, this posted it after I got your email about your agenda for this
group. Remember that email about you talking how you might go to jail
shortly for beating up or fighting with the cops . Then I was being nice as
I didn't know if this person was wanting to know about your sordid past you
told me about Fred! But now I can see it, and feel you may be totally
insane! You need some help badly.

You only just worked that one out?

snip load of crap from Stacey too

Enough of this already! From both if you!

BB

I agree, Bill.

Stacey, you don't look good by dragging an obviously mentall ill person
through the wringer in public. This is not a schoolyard, where lines
like "seek help immediately" and "are you off your meds?" are used as
arch, cynical put-downs ("Hey, look at me, i took an Introduction to
Psych course!"). Canadafred is obviously suffering from strong feelings
of persecution. The issue is not just that he is calling you names --
the core here is is writing sadly paranoid things like:

A vicious assault is still atking place and turns
its ugly head in many damaging directions to me,
to the co-conspirators and to the industry of SEO as
a whole.

and

I would like to point out that the email posted by
Billy, as a desperation measure of mine in an effort
to terminate embarassing discusions about me online.

and

I found my ass backed into a corner like a spider
and tried to spin my own web to get my ass out of
that posting.

and

for those that haven't a clue what I'm talking about,
the fight against me and a bunch of SEO groupies is
taking place

I cannot help but see a great deal of agitated and disordered thinking
in those extracts, as evidenced by the disordered grammar and syntax.

Much the same as the incoherent prose we've seen from him all along.
Except worse.

But you respond to the threat as if it were an organized charcter
assiassination plot, complete with legal threats. I think everyone here
who is used to dealing with logic, even in the abstract sense in which
it is used in programming and SEO, is aware that canadafred has crossed
a line that rational SEO experts do not cross.

Rational people in general, in fact.

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

On 13 Aug 2006 18:09:37 -0700, "dcashley" <dcashley (AT) adelphia (DOT) net>
wrote:

John Bokma wrote:
"dcashley" <dcashley (AT) adelphia (DOT) net> wrote:

Stacey, I'm sending e-mails to a few people, My partner and I don't
understand what is going on, we can't follow the blogs and feel as if
something or some information is missing. Is this your e-mail? Am I
right in understanding that the people who previously supported Freds
work are now filled with animosity towards him? Lost. Thanks for your
time.

This is not email, and please don't top post. If you have no clue what top
posting is (IIRC I have told you several times before), Google for it, and
learn and stop wasting resources.

--
John

Googlebot Stats: http://johnbokma.com/perl/googlebot-statistics.html

OK- I did as you asked and looked it up. I apologize for my
inexperience. This is not my genre. Anyway, I thought I was blogging
Stacey? But you were in the conversations as well, so you will do too.
My partner and I own a small Baby Linens company we started talking to
an SEO. There was negative feedback and we don't understand what was
going on. Do you know?Thanks for your time.

If the SEO in question was Fred I doubt anyone here would describe him
as being up to anything much at the moment. If you're set on using
Fred, my advice would be that you give him a few months to recuperate,
he's apparently not been too well lately. If you just need an SEO,
there's plenty more available.

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 14 Aug 2006 02:53:43 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

GW Bush is getting away with it.

We shouldn't have taught him how to wank, I guess.

--
John Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

Perl RSS Builder: http://johnbokma.com/perl/rss-web-feed-builder.html

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:42:26 +0200, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com>
wrote:

You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

GW Bush is getting away with it.

We shouldn't have taught him how to wank, I guess.

Just the opposite, that will give him some occupation, right now he plays
with things that are not his own.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-meter
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

On 14 Aug 2006 05:42:26 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 14 Aug 2006 02:53:43 GMT, John Bokma <john (AT) castleamber (DOT) com> wrote:

You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

GW Bush is getting away with it.

We shouldn't have taught him how to wank, I guess.

ROFL
--
Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

dcashley wrote:

this is a deranged bitch and I wouldn't gice her anything

You kids are so mature - for second graders. Can't you find some
play-dough or coloring books to occupy your time?

GW Bush is getting away with it.

Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know
that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and
executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. And we all know that he
is the reason we are paying $3.00 for gas (first president in the
history of the US to not use reserves to keep gas prices reasonable).

Just because most Americans are willing to fold up and accept a BS
story about terrorists (who are not listed on the coroners report of
the WTC and more than half of them are still alive and counted for) -
doesn't mean that Georgie is getting away with anything. It only means
that we are not strong enough as a people to stand up for ourselves.

You guys obviously don't have enough to do, so please visit
www.savetheinternet.com and do something about it.

On 14 Aug 2006 16:20:40 -0700, lastwhiteknights (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:

You kids are so mature - for second graders. Can't you find some
play-dough or coloring books to occupy your time?


GW Bush is getting away with it.

Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know
that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and
executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. And we all know that he
is the reason we are paying $3.00 for gas (first president in the
history of the US to not use reserves to keep gas prices reasonable).

Just because most Americans are willing to fold up and accept a BS
story about terrorists (who are not listed on the coroners report of
the WTC and more than half of them are still alive and counted for) -
doesn't mean that Georgie is getting away with anything. It only means
that we are not strong enough as a people to stand up for ourselves.

You guys obviously don't have enough to do, so please visit
www.savetheinternet.com and do something about it.

We seem to be getting more than our fair share lately, don't we?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm