google and yahoo are talking alliance

It is interesting that Microsoft's hostile take over bid for Yahoo has
put google out there as a 'white knight' to try to save Yahoo.

http://www.reuters.com/article/techn...rpc=22&sp=true

'Politics makes strange bed fellows'
If there is a yahoo google deal then google will keep its power at
least for another 5 years. MSN money rates google a 9 out of 10 in
terms a stock to invest in. While yahoo and msn are less rated
ussually. Now I know why, time and time again google show themselves
to be a dynamic company.


Mark
http://learnrussianlearnrussian.com/
http://learnspanishlearnspanish.com/
http://learnfrenchlearnfrench.com

<Markukasia (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote ...

If there is a yahoo google deal then google will keep its power at
least for another 5 years. MSN money rates google a 9 out of 10 in
terms a stock to invest in. While yahoo and msn are less rated
ussually. Now I know why, time and time again google show themselves
to be a dynamic company.

It is interesting, but I don't think google would be allowed to buy Yahoo!
.... too much of a monopoly.

But they may be able to help them stay independent (a dream solution!).

Take a look at this semi-insider view:
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/200...microsoft.html
--

Andrew
http://www.seo2seo.com/
http://www.sick-site-syndrome.com/
First things first - but not necessarily in that order.

The video that makes YouTube worthwhile:
Charlie The Unicorn - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus

"Andrew Heenan" <seo2seo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:60pld4F1s7ntgU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:

Markukasia (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote ...
If there is a yahoo google deal then google will keep its power at
least for another 5 years. MSN money rates google a 9 out of 10 in
terms a stock to invest in. While yahoo and msn are less rated
ussually. Now I know why, time and time again google show themselves
to be a dynamic company.

It is interesting, but I don't think google would be allowed to buy
Yahoo! ... too much of a monopoly.

For the same reason, the Micro$oft bid should be stopped. The one thing
worse than having too many "giants" is having so few that competition
dries up.

But they may be able to help them stay independent (a dream
solution!).

Take a look at this semi-insider view:
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/200...e-yahoo-from-m
icrosoft.html

No matter how you slice it, Joe User will land on the short end of the
stick.

--
http://blogdoofus.com

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:02:49 -0600, Ed
<apostle (AT) REMOVETHISpeculiar (DOT) homeip.net> wrote:

"Andrew Heenan" <seo2seo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:60pld4F1s7ntgU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:

Markukasia (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote ...
If there is a yahoo google deal then google will keep its power at
least for another 5 years. MSN money rates google a 9 out of 10 in
terms a stock to invest in. While yahoo and msn are less rated
ussually. Now I know why, time and time again google show themselves
to be a dynamic company.

It is interesting, but I don't think google would be allowed to buy
Yahoo! ... too much of a monopoly.

For the same reason, the Micro$oft bid should be stopped. The one thing
worse than having too many "giants" is having so few that competition
dries up.

But the giants being giants isn't a problem for anyone?

But they may be able to help them stay independent (a dream
solution!).

Take a look at this semi-insider view:
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/200...e-yahoo-from-m
icrosoft.html

No matter how you slice it, Joe User will land on the short end of the
stick.
--

http://www.orderonlinepickupinstore.co.uk
Ah fetch it yourself if you can't wait for delivery
http://www.freedeliveryuk.co.uk
Or get it delivered for free

"Mogga" <di (AT) nospamohpleasenospammogga (DOT) com> wrote ...

It is interesting, but I don't think google would be allowed to buy
Yahoo! ... too much of a monopoly.
For the same reason, the Micro$oft bid should be stopped. The one thing
worse than having too many "giants" is having so few that competition
dries up.
But the giants being giants isn't a problem for anyone?

Think of it as a fact of life.
Short of a revolution, capitalism is here to stay for a while.

No sense fretting over what you cannot fix.
Just hope that the least worst event occurs.
--
Andrew
eBaY Weirdities

Many Smoke at the Great Pipe of Knowledge.
But Not Everyone Inhales.

http://www.weirdity.com/ebay/

Norfolk & Way - Our Aim Is To Please
http://www.norfolk-and-way.com/

Mogga <di (AT) nospamohpleasenospammogga (DOT) com> wrote in
news:mlghq3ds8625kludagicroat9bkf0hri4t (AT) 4ax (DOT) com:

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:02:49 -0600, Ed
apostle (AT) REMOVETHISpeculiar (DOT) homeip.net> wrote:

"Andrew Heenan" <seo2seo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:60pld4F1s7ntgU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:

Markukasia (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote ...
If there is a yahoo google deal then google will keep its power at
least for another 5 years. MSN money rates google a 9 out of 10
in terms a stock to invest in. While yahoo and msn are less rated
ussually. Now I know why, time and time again google show
themselves to be a dynamic company.

It is interesting, but I don't think google would be allowed to buy
Yahoo! ... too much of a monopoly.

For the same reason, the Micro$oft bid should be stopped. The one
thing worse than having too many "giants" is having so few that
competition dries up.

But the giants being giants isn't a problem for anyone?

Oh, it's a problem alright, it's just better if there's enough of 'em so
that they can keep each other in line.




--
http://blogdoofus.com