 | |
Re: Use of RSS Feed Reader for SEO?
Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Use of RSS Feed Reader for SEO? -
06-09-2005
, 09:19 AM
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... |
page and given it a good positions in searches. You provide, in your page,
link to both - PHP and HTML version and only difference in both content
pages is one silly line where's date and time. So, why should google, yahoo
or msn spider both pages some point and NOT notice content is over 99%
identical?
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message news:TlXpe.26913$d5.178256 (AT) newsb (DOT) telia.net... Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... It wasn't that long ago when you were asking why google haven't indexed your page and given it a good positions in searches. You provide, in your page, link to both - PHP and HTML version and only difference in both content pages is one silly line where's date and time. So, why should google, yahoo or msn spider both pages some point and NOT notice content is over 99% identical? |
--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Wÿrm" <nomailstodragon (AT) north (DOT) invalid> skrev i meddelandet news:d89gip$1rs$1 (AT) phys-news1 (DOT) kolumbus.fi... "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message news:TlXpe.26913$d5.178256 (AT) newsb (DOT) telia.net... Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... It wasn't that long ago when you were asking why google haven't indexed your page and given it a good positions in searches. You provide, in your page, link to both - PHP and HTML version and only difference in both content pages is one silly line where's date and time. So, why should google, yahoo or msn spider both pages some point and NOT notice content is over 99% identical? That does not automatically say that this is the reason. |
automatically mean the impact of the fall on the pavement killed me.
I could have had a heart attack on the way down.
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Wÿrm" <nomailstodragon (AT) north (DOT) invalid> skrev i meddelandet news:d89gip$1rs$1 (AT) phys-news1 (DOT) kolumbus.fi... "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message news:TlXpe.26913$d5.178256 (AT) newsb (DOT) telia.net... Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... It wasn't that long ago when you were asking why google haven't indexed your page and given it a good positions in searches. You provide, in your page, link to both - PHP and HTML version and only difference in both content pages is one silly line where's date and time. So, why should google, yahoo or msn spider both pages some point and NOT notice content is over 99% identical? That does not automatically say that this is the reason. When I jump off a high building, and end up dead, it doesn't automatically mean the impact of the fall on the pavement killed me. I could have had a heart attack on the way down. |
Let´s assume ( although I have some doubts about it) that you were right
and that the only reason why a certain page would not be indexed were
because there is a copy of the same page.
In this case Google should eliminate all similar pages.
But what would happen?
That would be a very useless exercise for the user who would miss many
interesting pages.
--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Let´s assume ( although I have some doubts about it) that you were right and that the only reason why a certain page would not be indexed were because there is a copy of the same page. |
atleast these three things.
1. very few incoming links to pages/site from OTHER sites, not just from
inside your own.
2. plenty of duplicate content inside your OWN site that does look "spammy"
to search engines.
3. Usage of HTTPS that quite likely "slow" down spidering of pages.
Quote:
|
In this case Google should eliminate all similar pages. But what would happen? That would be a very useless exercise for the user who would miss many interesting pages. |
in same site, that DOES smell very fishy business and Google might react to
see that as a attempt to SPAM similar pages to bloat "content".
Even for a human, it is not very "interesting", no matter how you wish, if
same website has almost 100% identically pages with only difference being
date and time. And search engines, they don't know what is interesting. All
they do is apply their algorithms to content of a pages and sites...
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Els" <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl> skrev i meddelandet news:ccz88xim4mx8.16utckwxddoby$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net... Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Wÿrm" <nomailstodragon (AT) north (DOT) invalid> skrev i meddelandet news:d89gip$1rs$1 (AT) phys-news1 (DOT) kolumbus.fi... "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message news:TlXpe.26913$d5.178256 (AT) newsb (DOT) telia.net... Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... It wasn't that long ago when you were asking why google haven't indexed your page and given it a good positions in searches. You provide, in your page, link to both - PHP and HTML version and only difference in both content pages is one silly line where's date and time. So, why should google, yahoo or msn spider both pages some point and NOT notice content is over 99% identical? That does not automatically say that this is the reason. When I jump off a high building, and end up dead, it doesn't automatically mean the impact of the fall on the pavement killed me. I could have had a heart attack on the way down. Let´s assume ( although I have some doubts about it) that you were right and that the only reason why a certain page would not be indexed were because there is a copy of the same page. In this case Google should eliminate all similar pages. But what would happen? That would be a very useless exercise for the user who would miss many interesting pages. |
bother to get into Google. It's not Google's "fault", but the
webmaster's. If you would not upload your page to a server, no one
would be able to read it. If you make duplicate content, your site
won't show up in Google. Both are the webmaster's doing. More so after
that webmaster has been told many times about the consequences of his
actions.
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message news:xZXpe.139951$dP1.490934 (AT) newsc (DOT) telia.net... snip Let´s assume ( although I have some doubts about it) that you were right and that the only reason why a certain page would not be indexed were because there is a copy of the same page. Your biggest problem with not getting pages indexed is probably because of atleast these three things. 1. very few incoming links to pages/site from OTHER sites, not just from inside your own. |
True. But that should affect all the pages within the same website.
Quote:
|
2. plenty of duplicate content inside your OWN site that does look "spammy" to search engines. |
But that does not seem to affect all the search engines in the same way.
Quote:
|
3. Usage of HTTPS that quite likely "slow" down spidering of pages. |
--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Els" <els.aNOSPAM (AT) tiscali (DOT) nl> skrev i meddelandet news:ccz88xim4mx8.16utckwxddoby$.dlg (AT) 40tude (DOT) net... Luigi Donatello Asero wrote: "Wÿrm" <nomailstodragon (AT) north (DOT) invalid> skrev i meddelandet news:d89gip$1rs$1 (AT) phys-news1 (DOT) kolumbus.fi... "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll (AT) telia (DOT) com> wrote in message news:TlXpe.26913$d5.178256 (AT) newsb (DOT) telia.net... Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... It wasn't that long ago when you were asking why google haven't indexed your page and given it a good positions in searches. You provide, in your page, link to both - PHP and HTML version and only difference in both content pages is one silly line where's date and time. So, why should google, yahoo or msn spider both pages some point and NOT notice content is over 99% identical? That does not automatically say that this is the reason. When I jump off a high building, and end up dead, it doesn't automatically mean the impact of the fall on the pavement killed me. I could have had a heart attack on the way down. Let´s assume ( although I have some doubts about it) that you were right and that the only reason why a certain page would not be indexed were because there is a copy of the same page. In this case Google should eliminate all similar pages. But what would happen? That would be a very useless exercise for the user who would miss many interesting pages. The user would only miss the interesting pages a webmaster didn't bother to get into Google. It's not Google's "fault", but the webmaster's. If you would not upload your page to a server, no one would be able to read it. If you make duplicate content, your site won't show up in Google. Both are the webmaster's doing. More so after that webmaster has been told many times about the consequences of his actions. |
Altavista has done a good job.
--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv...na-chiessi.php
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Besides I have not registered any page at Google. So, it is not my fault if the search engine should register 2 similar pages... |
links from other site's pages etc then it will crawl your pages.
Stacey
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.