Re: Template for SEO.

I've used Dreamweaver to build
a few optimized sites (not my editor of choice though).

Spill the beans then! I've used DW for a long time - I'd be very interested
to know if there's better out there . . . . .

Buzby

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:12:33 +0100, "Buzby" <gb (AT) pumpupthe (DOT) net> wrote:

I've used Dreamweaver to build
a few optimized sites (not my editor of choice though).

Spill the beans then! I've used DW for a long time - I'd be very interested
to know if there's better out there . . . . .

Buzby

That noodling thing between your ears that gets in the way when you
try to stick a pencil through - that's better, if you can get the damn
thing to work.

BB

--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that loves a cuddle...
--

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:12:33 +0100, "Buzby" <gb (AT) pumpupthe (DOT) net> wrote:

I've used Dreamweaver to build
a few optimized sites (not my editor of choice though).

Spill the beans then! I've used DW for a long time - I'd be very interested
to know if there's better out there . . . . .

Buzby

Brain and a text editor :-))

My preferred text editor is a freeware program called NoteSpad. Lists
16 files at once and does a few basic search and replace type things,
but nothing fancy (not much different to Notepad).

BTW nothing wrong with Dreamweaver, I like how it can update a static
sites template via one file, can't do that with a text editor and my
brain doesn't like doing it :-))

Just avoid using the design view, WYSIAWYG (What You See Isn't Always
What You Get :-))

David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/