HighDots Forums  

Re: SEO = Rocket Science?

Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)


Discuss Re: SEO = Rocket Science? in the Search Engine Optimization forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Carol W
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-18-2005 , 06:39 PM






On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:34:19 GMT, "Ken Kay"
<trezadelgado.kruger (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
If we can be of any help?
Are you Pramod's sibling or something? Kind of odd to see tandem site
plugging in the same threads within around 24 hours on this group ...

Carol


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Stacey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-18-2005 , 07:09 PM








"Carol W" <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:34:19 GMT, "Ken Kay"
trezadelgado.kruger (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

If we can be of any help?

Are you Pramod's sibling or something? Kind of odd to see tandem site
plugging in the same threads within around 24 hours on this group ...

Carol
Do you think "Mary" is Ken's Mom? LOL!!!

Stacey




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Big Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-19-2005 , 05:40 AM



On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:39:44 GMT, Carol W <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:34:19 GMT, "Ken Kay"
trezadelgado.kruger (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

If we can be of any help?

Are you Pramod's sibling or something? Kind of odd to see tandem site
plugging in the same threads within around 24 hours on this group ...

Carol
And they're contacting people via private email also. They sent one to
me asking if they could help. Doesn't say much for their research,
does it?

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that watches the river flow...
--


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Carol W
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-19-2005 , 06:26 AM



On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:40:30 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk>
wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:39:44 GMT, Carol W <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote:

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:34:19 GMT, "Ken Kay"
trezadelgado.kruger (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

If we can be of any help?

Are you Pramod's sibling or something? Kind of odd to see tandem site
plugging in the same threads within around 24 hours on this group ...

Carol

And they're contacting people via private email also. They sent one to
me asking if they could help. Doesn't say much for their research,
does it?

What research? They are just wanting money - don't care where and how
they get it - so hitting up anyone/everyone. Has one question how good
their offerings are to begin with if they're so desperately peddling
them in such a manner. Sinking to collecting email addies from the
group to contact is just further opening them up to losing their site
hosting based on complaints for the felt spamming.

I wouldn't use either one based solely on what they posted here ...
and how; I mean if this is how they are marketing their sites then is
this how they would recommend thers to market their sites [in the
tutorial site] or how the 'company' would do it for their client's
sites?

The first one uses 5 to 6 comment tags to 'build up keyword density'
in their pages yet turn around and posts to this grou that keyword
density isn't important - but, on their 'expoert's' own site that same
density thought must be important enough to use an out-dated method to
try to bolster it though. *shrug* The second one doesn't make use of
keywords in the file names - names their files with keywords in them
but forgot the hyphen to help the words out and then there is a link
or two I see in the View Source that isn't visible on the site. This
is not taking into consideration their knowledge of HTML is using
FrontPage [even retaining the META tags for sharing that info if one
didn't recognize the cookie cutter 'theme' appearance].

Second site [Ken's] claims: "If your web site is not in the first Top
30 results you are loosing money every day and your portion of free
internet traffic." Must be true given the rash of "may we assist you?
posts shared here and, now, via email as the site isn't Top 30, or
even Top 50, for 'search engine marketing' or 'online marketing' or
'keyword density report' or 'search engine ranking report' or 'Search
Engine Simulator Report' - all phrases from the site's own headers or
body of content.

Carol



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Carol W
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-19-2005 , 06:35 AM



On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:26:06 GMT, Carol W <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote:

and then there is a link
Quote:
or two I see in the View Source that isn't visible on the site.
Correction: the links are visible. *whew* One saving grace for the
second one ... but only one so far.

Carol


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
SEO Dave
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-19-2005 , 10:37 AM



On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:26:06 GMT, Carol W <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Second site [Ken's] claims: "If your web site is not in the first Top
30 results you are loosing money every day and your portion of free
internet traffic." Must be true given the rash of "may we assist you?
So reading between the lines you'd highly recommend Ken and Barbie
(Pramod) as SEO Experts :-))

David


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.