![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Answer: SEO is not any magic. People who claim that they know the google algo are nothing but fakes. However, anyone can do SEO - of course you need to have good knowledge of HTML |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 17 Apr 2005 11:36:11 -0700, diyseo (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com (Pramod) wrote: Answer: SEO is not any magic. People who claim that they know the google algo are nothing but fakes. However, anyone can do SEO - of course you need to have good knowledge of HTML I have yet to see someone share that they know _all_ of google's algorithem. Or are you saying those who have figured out, through observation, bits that the algorithem appears to 'favors' or 'dislikes' are fakes? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
| "Carol W" <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c3b5615c6ltp7osgpsnctbh088ni7auve1 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On 17 Apr 2005 11:36:11 -0700, diyseo (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com (Pramod) wrote: Answer: SEO is not any magic. People who claim that they know the google algo are nothing but fakes. However, anyone can do SEO - of course you need to have good knowledge of HTML I have yet to see someone share that they know _all_ of google's algorithem. Or are you saying those who have figured out, through observation, bits that the algorithem appears to 'favors' or 'dislikes' are fakes? Sam usually figures out the algo, maybe this is where he is getting the fake part.:-) |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:27:52 -0400, "Stacey" stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote: "Carol W" <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c3b5615c6ltp7osgpsnctbh088ni7auve1 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On 17 Apr 2005 11:36:11 -0700, diyseo (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com (Pramod) wrote: Answer: SEO is not any magic. People who claim that they know the google algo are nothing but fakes. However, anyone can do SEO - of course you need to have good knowledge of HTML I have yet to see someone share that they know _all_ of google's algorithem. Or are you saying those who have figured out, through observation, bits that the algorithem appears to 'favors' or 'dislikes' are fakes? Sam usually figures out the algo, maybe this is where he is getting the fake part.:-) Has Sam ever claimed to know the whole algo though? or that he thought he figured out something in it? Memory fuzzy ... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |