![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬) wrote: It's obvious what it is and the theory of it, but would it not just be classed as a bit of spider spam? http://www.gymm.co.uk/ further to that... if you click the last link on the left "gym" you get a list of seemingly random gym+(word) dunno why anyone might want a link called http://www.gymm.co.uk/gymfuck/ ! It's surely bordering on a site worthy of exclusion for wasting S.E. resources? |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:34:56 GMT, "Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬)" PeTe33 (AT) gymratz (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬) wrote: It's obvious what it is and the theory of it, but would it not just be classed as a bit of spider spam? http://www.gymm.co.uk/ further to that... if you click the last link on the left "gym" you get a list of seemingly random gym+(word) dunno why anyone might want a link called http://www.gymm.co.uk/gymfuck/ ! It's surely bordering on a site worthy of exclusion for wasting S.E. resources? Perhaps this is the occasion for your first spam report? If you sign in to Google Webmaster tools you can do it from there: https://www.google.com/accounts/Serv...Fhl%3Den&hl=en |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |