Re: Pricing model for links...whats reasonable?

Darren Tipton wrote:

But roughly, if anyone on here does charge for links, what kind of
pricing
model to do use?

This question has come up couple days back in alt.www.webmaster

We have that thread archived here:

http://www.1-script.com/forums/Re-He...cle40564-2.htm

Check it out. I think there is no need to duplicate the effort.


--

Cheers,
Dmitri
http://www.1-script.com/download.php
Free Search Engine Scripts
-------------------------------------


--
##-----------------------------------------------##
Article posted with Web Developer's USENET Archive
http://www.1-script.com/forums
Web and RSS gateway to your favorite newsgroup -
alt.internet.search-engines - 15373 messages and counting!
##-----------------------------------------------##

In article <pg00f.76799$zZ.46359 (AT) fe04 (DOT) news.easynews.com>, info_at_1-
script_dot_com (AT) foo (DOT) com says...

Darren Tipton wrote:

But roughly, if anyone on here does charge for links, what kind of
pricing
model to do use?

This question has come up couple days back in alt.www.webmaster

We have that thread archived here:

http://www.1-script.com/forums/Re-He...cle40564-2.htm

Check it out. I think there is no need to duplicate the effort.

That site is unbelievably hard work. The post is somewhat
disengeneous too, since the posts are archived by google, and that is a
far better place to view it...

The link will wrap:-


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt..._thread/thread
/bf1542a2d2780002/6bf2c067dead2e5c?hl=en#6bf2c067dead2e5c


Also, your sig. seperater needs some attention, along with the
amount of content contained within the sig...

HTH :-)

--
Regards,

Will.

Will wrote:

That site is unbelievably hard work.
The post is somewhat
disengeneous too, since the posts are archived by google, and that is a
far better place to view it...

Hi Will. Thanks for the feedback. Every site needs work, lots of it. So,
any feedback is appreciated. I take it as you had problems using my site.
Do you mind elaborating on that?

Disengeneous? Google's 'define' feature fails on that one:

http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Adisengeneous

The link will wrap:-
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt..._thread/thread
/bf1542a2d2780002/6bf2c067dead2e5c?hl=en#6bf2c067dead2e5c

*My* links don't wrap ;-)

Also, your sig. seperater needs some attention, along with the
amount of content contained within the sig...
HTH :-)

I've tried a few separators in the past. What do *you* think will do best?


--

Cheers,
Dmitri
http://www.1-script.com/download.php
Free Search Engine Scripts
-------------------------------------

-
##-----------------------------------------------#
Article posted with Web Developer's USENET Archiv
http://www.1-script.com/forum
Web and RSS gateway to your favorite newsgroup -
alt.internet.search-engines - 15396 messages and counting
##-----------------------------------------------##

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:05:12 +0200, Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer
<mikkel (AT) fabel (DOT) dk> wrote:

www.1-script.com wrote:

*My* links don't wrap ;-)

I have had some success with putting <> around the link, this will often
protect it from being wrapped.

Or you can use tinyurl.com and never have that problem again

plh
Paul
--
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/houston...ds-page-1.html
Ear Threads - the hottest fashion item.


http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer wrote:

I already gave you the solution a long time ago, but you never reacted
to it.

The standard separator, recognised by all news readers that recognise
separators, is: two hyphens, a space and a line break. What is lacking
in your case is the space.

Some noncompliant news readers - such as older versions of Outlook
Express - remove the space before sending, leaving the separator
non-standard. However, this is an error that has been corrected in the
past.

This should be an easy problem for you to solve.

Oh, hey Mikkel,

I do remember you suggesting a solution, and I *did* act on that right
away. The problem was - that space before the line break eluded me. We'll
I've added it now, we'll see if it works.

--

Cheers,
Dmitri
http://www.1-script.com/download.php
Free Search Engine Scripts
-------------------------------------

--
##-----------------------------------------------#
Article posted with Web Developer's USENET Archiv
http://www.1-script.com/forum
Web and RSS gateway to your favorite newsgroup -
alt.internet.search-engines - 15401 messages and counting
##-----------------------------------------------##

www.1-script.com wrote:

Oh, hey Mikkel,

I do remember you suggesting a solution, and I *did* act on that right
away. The problem was - that space before the line break eluded me. We'll
I've added it now, we'll see if it works.

Yep, that did it!

It is still bad netiquette that you post two sigs with each post.

In the groups where I participate it is generally accepted to use a
signature of 4 lines max. (excluding the -- ). Yours occupies 15 lines.

However, your bad behaviour is a little less annoying now that my
newsreader fades out the part of your posts that is "spamming", and cuts
it off automatically when replying :-) Wish it could do something
similar to Bill's quotes too...

Mikkel

--
Guatemala travel, Spanish studies, volunteering:
http://lakjer.dk/mikkel/spanish.shtml