![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:23:04 -0700, Don <no (AT) adr (DOT) com> wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:02:49 +0100, mogga <di (AT) NOSPAMPLEASEmogga (DOT) com> wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:32:53 -0700, Don <no (AT) adr (DOT) com> wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:23:29 +0100, mogga <di (AT) NOSPAMPLEASEmogga (DOT) com> wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:48:27 -0700, Don <no (AT) adr (DOT) com> wrote: Besides having unnecessary meta tags, can you think of anything else I might do to improve searchablity. Do you think the rotating picture applet is really a problem? My reply further up you might have missed I would also ditch that horrible photo rotator. Copyfade applets are unneccessay imo. Put a static image. Get some alt text on it. Do you have any links in? Google likes links in. Thanks for your reply Mogga. When you say "horrible", is it that you just dislike it, or is there a technical reason why it would be better not to use it? Does it have any alt text? Can it have alt text? Is it better than an animtated gif? Does it take longer to load? Give me 10 reasons why you should have an applet rather than an image. I thin kI might have emailed you via the site contacts about a link I've made to you. What does "imo" mean? Thanks, Don In My Opinion. Also as IMHO (honest). BB -- www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk seo that loves a cuddle... Thanks BB. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
I thin kI might have emailed you via the site contacts about a link I've made to you. I didn't receive any email from you. But, thank you for the link. I'm beginning to think that's probably the biggest reason why Arioso Duo isn't being index by google. I do plan to trim down the meta tags, and maybe that will help some also. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
alt text in images is indexed in image links. It's taken some notice of. It counts towards the ranking of your page. I'm saying you don't need to worry unduly as you don't have too much competition to beat. I dunno why Mogga is banging on. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:32:54 -0700, Don <no (AT) adr (DOT) com> wrote: I thin kI might have emailed you via the site contacts about a link I've made to you. I didn't receive any email from you. But, thank you for the link. I'm beginning to think that's probably the biggest reason why Arioso Duo isn't being index by google. I do plan to trim down the meta tags, and maybe that will help some also. OK. So where does the email go using the contacts on that site? I just successfully sent an email to "don.downin (AT) reachoutsystems (DOT) com" using |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:17:45 +0100, mogga <di (AT) NOSPAMPLEASEmogga (DOT) com> wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:32:54 -0700, Don <no (AT) adr (DOT) com> wrote: I thin kI might have emailed you via the site contacts about a link I've made to you. I didn't receive any email from you. But, thank you for the link. I'm beginning to think that's probably the biggest reason why Arioso Duo isn't being index by google. I do plan to trim down the meta tags, and maybe that will help some also. OK. So where does the email go using the contacts on that site? I just successfully sent an email to "don.downin (AT) reachoutsystems (DOT) com" using the link on ariosoduo.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |