HighDots Forums  

Re: SEO = Rocket Science?

Search Engine Optimization Discussion about SEO/Search Engine Optimization (alt.internet.search-engines)


Discuss Re: SEO = Rocket Science? in the Search Engine Optimization forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Big Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-12-2005 , 04:11 PM






On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:58:06 +0100, "mark | r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:
You pay for expertise and experience - if theyre as good as they say then
THEY should be no1 for "search engine optimisation" in google shouldnt they?
I'm not. You going to say I'm no good?
More than you do, I mean. Sigh.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that loves a cuddle...
--


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
mark | r
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-13-2005 , 03:53 AM







"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:58:06 +0100, "mark | r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com
wrote:

You pay for expertise and experience - if theyre as good as they say then
THEY should be no1 for "search engine optimisation" in google shouldnt
they?

I'm not. You going to say I'm no good?
More than you do, I mean. Sigh.
it stands to reason that the best seo will be page#1 ?

Mark




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Big Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-13-2005 , 06:24 AM



On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:53:57 +0100, "mark | r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:
"Big Bill" <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:7s9o51d4dmb0breck5libbfbbf7ifvf5io (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:58:06 +0100, "mark | r" <markrush (AT) gmail (DOT) com
wrote:

You pay for expertise and experience - if theyre as good as they say then
THEY should be no1 for "search engine optimisation" in google shouldnt
they?

I'm not. You going to say I'm no good?
More than you do, I mean. Sigh.

it stands to reason that the best seo will be page#1 ?

Mark
No, it stands to reason that the seo who had the biggest budget and a
penchant for buying ibls before Florida will be no 1. Just like they
were then and probably will be in a thousand years or until Google
change their algo to allow new sites a shot. Jeez, we taught you
nothing here?

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that loves a cuddle...
--


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
SEO Dave
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-13-2005 , 02:20 PM



On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:24:43 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk>
wrote:

Quote:
No, it stands to reason that the seo who had the biggest budget and a
penchant for buying ibls before Florida will be no 1. Just like they
were then and probably will be in a thousand years or until Google
change their algo to allow new sites a shot. Jeez, we taught you
nothing here?

BB
Eventually Bill new sites become old.

Florida was ~18 months ago, I've got sites that are post Florida that
are doing well now (9 and 10 month old sites for example). If you have
a site over 1 year old that's not doing well it's not because it's
new.

David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Stacey
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-13-2005 , 02:59 PM





"SEO Dave" <seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote in
message news:bntp519m3dpip9qhg8lvap623uv0jkn166 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
Quote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:24:43 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk
wrote:

No, it stands to reason that the seo who had the biggest budget and a
penchant for buying ibls before Florida will be no 1. Just like they
were then and probably will be in a thousand years or until Google
change their algo to allow new sites a shot. Jeez, we taught you
nothing here?

BB

Eventually Bill new sites become old.

Florida was ~18 months ago, I've got sites that are post Florida that
are doing well now (9 and 10 month old sites for example). If you have
a site over 1 year old that's not doing well it's not because it's
new.
Actually, things changed after Brandy really. I think Florida was a big
change but wasn't tweaked properly then after Brandy things worked better. I
changed my homepage right after Florida made it smaller and moved the
content to another page. It brought it up some at #30 instead of 100, after
Brandy I moved to the top 5 and have been there since.

There are just to many SEO's out there going for the top 10. So, to me if
you make it to the top 5 for the hardest SEO SERP you are an outstanding
awesome SEO and if you make it to the top 10 you are pretty awesome, top 20
great, top 50 good! ;-)

Stacey




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Big Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-13-2005 , 06:19 PM



On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:20:57 GMT, SEO Dave
<seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:24:43 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk
wrote:

No, it stands to reason that the seo who had the biggest budget and a
penchant for buying ibls before Florida will be no 1. Just like they
were then and probably will be in a thousand years or until Google
change their algo to allow new sites a shot. Jeez, we taught you
nothing here?

BB

Eventually Bill new sites become old.

Florida was ~18 months ago, I've got sites that are post Florida that
are doing well now (9 and 10 month old sites for example). If you have
a site over 1 year old that's not doing well it's not because it's
new.

David
The linking problems remain. Sites with a zillion then have a zillion
plus now. Sites with a handful now are unable to make this gap up.
No-one can find them. Actually I'm getting round this but Lordy it's
slow. Possibly an advantage when the next algo comes along though, a
biggie I mean.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that loves a cuddle...
--


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
SEO Dave
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-13-2005 , 09:57 PM



On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:19:56 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk>
wrote:

Quote:
Eventually Bill new sites become old.

Florida was ~18 months ago, I've got sites that are post Florida that
are doing well now (9 and 10 month old sites for example). If you have
a site over 1 year old that's not doing well it's not because it's
new.

David

The linking problems remain. Sites with a zillion then have a zillion
plus now. Sites with a handful now are unable to make this gap up.
No-one can find them.
Hi,

I don't have a problem finding links since I tend to create my own.
Take a look at this new section to a site of mine
http://william-shakespeare.classic-l...uk/book-store/

Click on a few of the menu links and estimate the number of pages
added you should come to around 10,000 pages. There's also a UK
version with another 6500 pages. The main site
http://william-shakespeare.classic-literature.co.uk/ has around 9,000
pages indexed already, so over doubled the number of pages. Can also
add German, Canadian and Japanese and probably others versions long
term. All generated dynamically using Amazon's XML feed.

That's just one section of one site. Will be creating a set of sites
like those for every author I've listed and other sites for other
products (would not be surprised to find I've got a million pages like
these indexed within 12 months). With the addition of a random link on
each page they can be used to not only gain traffic in their own
right, but as pages to link to other important pages.

Not even finished the site yet (not added a main page intro) and
already have good placement for

William Shakespeare Book Store
Shakespeare Book Store
William Shakespeare Store

And that's with only the one page
http://william-shakespeare.classic-l...uk/book-store/
indexed in Google (link added to it less than 48hrs ago). Will be very
interesting to see how Google reacts to all the new pages with
diverse, but relevant content.

You got to get proactive since your competition isn't sitting on it's
hands.

Quote:
Actually I'm getting round this but Lordy it's
slow. Possibly an advantage when the next algo comes along though, a
biggie I mean.
You got some inside info Bill :-))

Quote:
BB
David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Big Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-14-2005 , 03:06 AM



On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:57:40 GMT, SEO Dave
<seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:19:56 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk
wrote:

Eventually Bill new sites become old.

Florida was ~18 months ago, I've got sites that are post Florida that
are doing well now (9 and 10 month old sites for example). If you have
a site over 1 year old that's not doing well it's not because it's
new.

David

The linking problems remain. Sites with a zillion then have a zillion
plus now. Sites with a handful now are unable to make this gap up.
No-one can find them.

Hi,

I don't have a problem finding links since I tend to create my own.
Me too and it works but slowly as I write mine myself. And we know how
slow I am! Duh!

Quote:
Take a look at this new section to a site of mine
http://william-shakespeare.classic-l...uk/book-store/

Click on a few of the menu links and estimate the number of pages
added you should come to around 10,000 pages. There's also a UK
version with another 6500 pages. The main site
http://william-shakespeare.classic-literature.co.uk/ has around 9,000
pages indexed already, so over doubled the number of pages. Can also
add German, Canadian and Japanese and probably others versions long
term. All generated dynamically using Amazon's XML feed.
I didn't know they did one. I have my own RSS feed at
www.kruse.co.uk/tsunami.xml but it's really me doing my Mr Angry bit
to get familiar with the technology. I doubt it gets read by anyone.

Quote:
That's just one section of one site. Will be creating a set of sites
like those for every author I've listed and other sites for other
products (would not be surprised to find I've got a million pages like
these indexed within 12 months). With the addition of a random link on
each page they can be used to not only gain traffic in their own
right, but as pages to link to other important pages.
they aren't on-topic though, for anything outside their limited field.
It would arguably suit me as I do author sites anyway - walk down my
road and my front window is the one half-filled with books! True! I
have around 15,000.

Quote:
Not even finished the site yet (not added a main page intro) and
already have good placement for

William Shakespeare Book Store
Shakespeare Book Store
William Shakespeare Store

And that's with only the one page
http://william-shakespeare.classic-l...uk/book-store/
indexed in Google (link added to it less than 48hrs ago). Will be very
interesting to see how Google reacts to all the new pages with
diverse, but relevant content.

You got to get proactive since your competition isn't sitting on it's
hands.
I *am* doing this! I actively encourage my clients to create their own
pages on a diary type basis. Chock-full of relevant industry keywords
and phrases.

Quote:
Actually I'm getting round this but Lordy it's
slow. Possibly an advantage when the next algo comes along though, a
biggie I mean.

You got some inside info Bill :-))
I intend surviving the next earthquake, when it comes!

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that loves a cuddle...
--


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
SEO Dave
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-14-2005 , 11:59 PM



On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:06:54 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk>
wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:57:40 GMT, SEO Dave
seodave (AT) search-engine-optimizat...es (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Hi,

I don't have a problem finding links since I tend to create my own.

Me too and it works but slowly as I write mine myself. And we know how
slow I am! Duh!
Hi,

That's why you (semi) automate it using free content, public domain
and affiliate content. 4 years ago I didn't own a single domain or how
to code a page. Beginning of this year I had about 100,000 pages
online all but about 5,000 created since last Feb (highest PR I had
before Feb was PR5, now PR7s). This week I've added a further 40,000+
pages (about 10,000 under the SEO Gold domain today) and will be
creating another 10,000+ page section to another site today. Soon as I
have the templates right I'll be doing the same for my long term
clients as well (for no extra cost).

Quote:
term. All generated dynamically using Amazon's XML feed.

I didn't know they did one. I have my own RSS feed at
www.kruse.co.uk/tsunami.xml but it's really me doing my Mr Angry bit
to get familiar with the technology. I doubt it gets read by anyone.
I don't see the big deal about "creating" a RSS feed. Unless you
create something worth copying I don't see the point.

Quote:
That's just one section of one site. Will be creating a set of sites
like those for every author I've listed and other sites for other
products (would not be surprised to find I've got a million pages like
these indexed within 12 months). With the addition of a random link on
each page they can be used to not only gain traffic in their own
right, but as pages to link to other important pages.

they aren't on-topic though, for anything outside their limited field.
There is a lot of scope if you go for semi relevant, but there will be
sites that you just can't create a reasonable sized Amazon store for.
Look at the sections added to the SEO Gold site, the Search Engine
books is highly relevant, the Website Design ones (like PHP
Programming) are semi relevant.

Quote:
It would arguably suit me as I do author sites anyway - walk down my
road and my front window is the one half-filled with books! True! I
have around 15,000.
I believe you, we have over 3,000 books. I think with 15,000 we'd need
to use some as table legs etc... to find room for them :-) We already
have 4 to the ceiling bookshelves that are completely filled with
books. I barely get the time to read any more, but the kids go through
books at a rate of several a day!

Quote:
You got to get proactive since your competition isn't sitting on it's
hands.

I *am* doing this! I actively encourage my clients to create their own
pages on a diary type basis. Chock-full of relevant industry keywords
and phrases.
I've found small sites tend to do poorly in the SERPs no matter what
the PR, there's only so many SERPs you can get per page. If you want a
lot of traffic (over 1,000 unique visitors a day) you need a large
site. It's difficult when busy to find the time to create relevant
content. I've been working on the SEO Tutorial for over two years now
and still only done a handful of pages. What I did today changed a <
20 page site into a 10,000+ page site over night (just got to wait for
the bots to do there thing now).

I just got the first pages indexed from the first Amazon site I
uploaded (40 pages indexed) and it's looking very, very good.

Quote:
Actually I'm getting round this but Lordy it's
slow. Possibly an advantage when the next algo comes along though, a
biggie I mean.

You got some inside info Bill :-))

I intend surviving the next earthquake, when it comes!
I should hope so living in the UK :-)

Quote:
BB

David
--
Free Search Engine Optimization Tutorial
http://www.seo-gold.com/tutorial/


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Big Bill
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SEO = Rocket Science? - 04-15-2005 , 06:12 AM



On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 03:59:13 GMT, SEO Dave
<seodave (AT) search-engine-optimization-services (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:06:54 GMT, Big Bill <kruse (AT) cityscape (DOT) co.uk
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:57:40 GMT, SEO Dave
seodave (AT) search-engine-optimizat...es (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Hi,

I don't have a problem finding links since I tend to create my own.

Me too and it works but slowly as I write mine myself. And we know how
slow I am! Duh!

Hi,

That's why you (semi) automate it using free content, public domain
and affiliate content. 4 years ago I didn't own a single domain or how
to code a page. Beginning of this year I had about 100,000 pages
online all but about 5,000 created since last Feb (highest PR I had
before Feb was PR5, now PR7s). This week I've added a further 40,000+
pages (about 10,000 under the SEO Gold domain today) and will be
creating another 10,000+ page section to another site today. Soon as I
have the templates right I'll be doing the same for my long term
clients as well (for no extra cost).

term. All generated dynamically using Amazon's XML feed.

I didn't know they did one. I have my own RSS feed at
www.kruse.co.uk/tsunami.xml but it's really me doing my Mr Angry bit
to get familiar with the technology. I doubt it gets read by anyone.

I don't see the big deal about "creating" a RSS feed. Unless you
create something worth copying I don't see the point.
Well the point was to see what could be done with it. So far, not
much. But I've learned a lot. One of my former clients could really
use it to good effect but I can't talk them round to it.

Quote:
That's just one section of one site. Will be creating a set of sites
like those for every author I've listed and other sites for other
products (would not be surprised to find I've got a million pages like
these indexed within 12 months). With the addition of a random link on
each page they can be used to not only gain traffic in their own
right, but as pages to link to other important pages.

they aren't on-topic though, for anything outside their limited field.

There is a lot of scope if you go for semi relevant, but there will be
sites that you just can't create a reasonable sized Amazon store for.
Look at the sections added to the SEO Gold site, the Search Engine
books is highly relevant,
Actually I should do one of them, I have so many normal authors it
wouldn't take much.

Quote:
the Website Design ones (like PHP
Programming) are semi relevant.

It would arguably suit me as I do author sites anyway - walk down my
road and my front window is the one half-filled with books! True! I
have around 15,000.

I believe you, we have over 3,000 books. I think with 15,000 we'd need
to use some as table legs etc... to find room for them :-)
Eeeek! I meant 1500! Still a lot!

Quote:
We already
have 4 to the ceiling bookshelves that are completely filled with
books. I barely get the time to read any more, but the kids go through
books at a rate of several a day!

You got to get proactive since your competition isn't sitting on it's
hands.

I *am* doing this! I actively encourage my clients to create their own
pages on a diary type basis. Chock-full of relevant industry keywords
and phrases.

I've found small sites tend to do poorly in the SERPs no matter what
the PR, there's only so many SERPs you can get per page.
I agree.

Quote:
If you want a
lot of traffic (over 1,000 unique visitors a day) you need a large
site. It's difficult when busy to find the time to create relevant
content. I've been working on the SEO Tutorial for over two years now
and still only done a handful of pages. What I did today changed a
20 page site into a 10,000+ page site over night (just got to wait for
the bots to do there thing now).
My seo tutorial ranks surprisingly well for vanilla seo. As the mood
takes I must expand it. Sometime things you don't expect to do well do
great.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ seo (AT) kruse (DOT) demon.co.uk
seo that loves a cuddle...
--


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.