What's the latest around here?

hows it going around here?
Plenty of feuding going on with sam & dave still?
Are the serps competitions still going on?
Does the group agree that "anchor text is kind" at the moment?
Does the group agree that sandboxing is in effect?

How are your serps doing everyone?
Mine are still kind of steady. Not great, but good enough for now

later
mark

Yonnermark wrote in
<2nc48fFutdgcU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de>

hows it going around here?

It lacks your contributions.

Plenty of feuding going on with sam & dave still?

Dunno - Alt-M S

Are the serps competitions still going on?

Not lately.

Does the group agree that "anchor text is kind" at the moment?

It's kind of king still.

Does the group agree that sandboxing is in effect?

I thought so but got a fairly forceful correction last time I mentioned it.

How are your serps doing everyone?

One struggles ever onwards...

Mine are still kind of steady. Not great, but good enough for now

Good enough is often good enough.

And, speaking of which, it's good to hear from you.

--
PeterMcC
If you feel that any of the above is incorrect,
inappropriate or offensive in any way,
please ignore it and accept my apologies.

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:48:17 +0100, Yonnermark wrote:

Does the group agree that sandboxing is in effect?

I *hope* sandboxing is true. If it isn't, I have to come up with a whole
new excuse for why my sites are doing so poorly.

Matt Cutts from Google stated at SES that sandboxing did not exist.


--
Will
Webmaster: http://www.internet-search-engines-faq.com

On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 01:42:25 GMT, Will Spencer
<will.spencer (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:48:17 +0100, Yonnermark wrote:

Does the group agree that sandboxing is in effect?

I *hope* sandboxing is true. If it isn't, I have to come up with a whole
new excuse for why my sites are doing so poorly.

Matt Cutts from Google stated at SES that sandboxing did not exist.

I don't think anybody at Google actually understands what Google does
anymore.

BB

Matt Cutts from Google stated at SES that sandboxing did not exist.

SES in London? I missed that!

"Will Spencer" <will.spencer (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com> wrote in
message
newsan.2004.08.05.01.40.55.887000 (AT) internet-search-engines-faq (DOT) com...

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:48:17 +0100, Yonnermark wrote:

Does the group agree that sandboxing is in effect?

I *hope* sandboxing is true. If it isn't, I have to come up with a whole
new excuse for why my sites are doing so poorly.

Matt Cutts from Google stated at SES that sandboxing did not exist.


--
Will
Webmaster: http://www.internet-search-engines-faq.com

Rest assured it does.

They also say "officlally" that they do not withhold passing PR to anohter
site but we have TONS of proof of that as well.

--
James
http://www.AICompany.com - SEO, Web Development and Hosting
http://www.SEO-highrankings.com -FREE SEO TOOLS

Yonnermark wrote:

hows it going around here?

Less interesting when you are not posting.

Plenty of feuding going on with sam & dave still?

Mostly on Sam's part, as usual.

Are the serps competitions still going on?

I haven't seen one lately, but i don't play that game.

Does the group agree that "anchor text is kind" at the moment?

Kind? Sure, anchor text has been good to me.

Does the group agree that sandboxing is in effect?

n/a to my work, so i have no opinion.

How are your serps doing everyone?

Very well, thank you. Dropped from #1 to #2 on saltpeter, the weirdest
serp i ever did not optimize for and got anyway. But the real
important ones are holding steady up and down within a point or two
every time there is a shimmy.

Mine are still kind of steady. Not great, but good enough for now

Good enough means they put bread on the table and meat in the pot.

later

how much later?

mark

Cordially,

cat yronwode

Lucky Mojo Curio Co. http://www.luckymojo.com/catalogue.html