Re: NEW newsgroup proposals

On 16 Jan 2005 04:59:57 GMT,
will.spencer (AT) internet-search-en...OT) NOSPAM.com (Will.Spencer)
wrote:

Please, take your psychosis to a more relevant newsgroup.

Does the NG of alt.way.out.in-left-field even exist? It's about the
only relevant NG can think of his double-shared posts.

Then again, there was other group that was crossposting some bizarre
stuff last year ... maybe his posts would fit in there?

Oh well, back to work ...

Carol

"CarolW." <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote

On 16 Jan 2005 04:59:57 GMT,
will.spencer (AT) internet-search-en...OT) NOSPAM.com (Will.Spencer)
wrote:

Please, take your psychosis to a more relevant newsgroup.

Does the NG of alt.way.out.in-left-field even exist? It's about the
only relevant NG can think of his double-shared posts.

Then again, there was other group that was crossposting some bizarre
stuff last year ... maybe his posts would fit in there?

There is alt.psycho , alt.strange.days, alt.crazy.people. But since
alt.bored have nothing to do maybe he can post there?

Stacey

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:36:56 -0500, "Stacey"
<stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"CarolW." <from_you (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:41e9f5f2.35651179 (AT) news (DOT) prodigy.net...
On 16 Jan 2005 04:59:57 GMT,
will.spencer (AT) internet-search-en...OT) NOSPAM.com (Will.Spencer)
wrote:

Please, take your psychosis to a more relevant newsgroup.

Does the NG of alt.way.out.in-left-field even exist? It's about the
only relevant NG can think of his double-shared posts.

Then again, there was other group that was crossposting some bizarre
stuff last year ... maybe his posts would fit in there?

There is alt.psycho , alt.strange.days, alt.crazy.people. But since
alt.bored have nothing to do maybe he can post there?

But his posts I find boring. They are all the same now 'cause he
follows a template.

Let's see -
* "draconian Liberals" needs be mentioned at least once, twice is
preferred and thrice would be glorious but bare minanum is once and
preferably in the first fold.
* Other 'mention at least once thoughts' are "Patriot Act III" and
"anti-God" and, of course, "Republican". \
* Cite a particular news program - either by quoting something said ot
just mentioning its named [better if sharing air time for those
without access to a TV Guide].
* "Judeo-Xians" peppered liberally. throughout.
* Close with a cheery thought of "kill the Liberals"
* Inbetween put in all kinds of nonsense that doesn't need to make any
sense anyway but just sound like you are doing some kind of cheer for
the folks who still love high school rivalry thoughts so want to do
the pom-pom thing of "my team is better than your team"

Follow-up:
*anything you don't like or can't understand as a response is deemed
to be posted by a "Liberal".

I think some of the responses - negative or patting of hte back kind -
are from his computer as an excuse for him to whiop out the above
template and share anotehr diatribe of sorts.

*zzzzzzzzzzz* No originality after 5 times of limiting oneself to such
a template. It would just have the folks in alt.bored remain bored or,
worse, become MORE bored.

Carol