![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you don't want to be considered a spammer, may I suggest you take a more personal approach? Some engines work by themed pages, so backlinks with just any old site will be no use, and may even be harmful. Hi, I think you are giving search engines too much credit. They work on mathematical algorithms and so to theme a page (let alone a site) is far from an easy/straight forward task. To really theme a page/site you need intelligence, knowledge and the ability to make judgements. |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you don't want to be considered a spammer, may I suggest you take a more personal approach? Some engines work by themed pages, so backlinks with just any old site will be no use, and may even be harmful. Hi, I think you are giving search engines too much credit. They work on mathematical algorithms and so to theme a page (let alone a site) is far from an easy/straight forward task. To really theme a page/site you need intelligence, knowledge and the ability to make judgements. I was under the impression that Teoma lends more weight than Google does to the subject of imbound links, and this is what I had in mind. I don't know if this means the words on the page are counted, or the text of inbound links coupled with the text of their inbound links, and so on. I could be wrong, of course. Google is the one everyone cares about now, but that might not always be the case and other engines work slightly differently. -- Alice Woolley http://www.insidethebubble.co.uk/ Inside the Bubble - autism information |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 11 Aug 2003 00:55:36 GMT, foxglove54321 (AT) aol (DOT) comblahblah (Foxglove54321) wrote: I was under the impression that Teoma lends more weight than Google does to the subject of imbound links, and this is what I had in mind. Hi, To be honest I don't keep track of what other search engines are doing as the amount of traffic isn't worth the trouble yet, still plenty to squeeze out of Google for our site :-) I don't know if this means the words on the page are counted, or the text of inbound links coupled with the text of their inbound links, and so on. I could be wrong, of course. No one knows precisely how search engines work, but you can make some reasonable guesses. For example if the text on the page of a linking page (other than the anchor text) is considered in the calculation (i.e. theme based) it's reasonable to assume text closer to the link may count more and the anchor text will be more important than all the other text. Then again it may be a case each word in the anchor text is compared to the rest of the text and depending on the number of times that word is on the page determines the weight that link is given. So a link from a page with a lot of instances of a keyword will be worth more than a link from a page without the keyword present. This would be a lot easier to incorporate into an algo than deciding if a site is about theme X etc... Until someone does conclusive tests it's all guesswork. Google is the one everyone cares about now, but that might not always be the case and other engines work slightly differently. And if that happens you can slowly change your site to accommodate the changes. It's not like Google is likely to shutdown or become unpopular over night, so we would see a gradual decrease in Google traffic as the shift occurred. Speaking from personal experience it took me a few months to learn how to change our site for Google and at the same time get reasonable rankings/traffic. Doesn't take long to adapt. David _ Adult Lingerie UK http://www.adultlingerieuk.com -- Alice Woolley http://www.insidethebubble.co.uk/ Inside the Bubble - autism information |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |