Re: Google sitemaps ... food for thought?

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:08:15 +0100, Stacey
<Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

Justin like your web design. Just a little error I found in some
spelling as
I skimmed through it. At the bottom where you speak about if someone
wants
to help you misspelled other - you have "outher". Anyway, real nice
layout!

Which browser have you used? IE? And you still like his design?

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

Borek wrote:

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:08:15 +0100, Stacey
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

Justin like your web design. Just a little error I found in some
spelling as
I skimmed through it. At the bottom where you speak about if someone
wants
to help you misspelled other - you have "outher". Anyway, real nice
layout!

Which browser have you used? IE? And you still like his design?

heh - new design donations welcomed!

--
Justin Koivisto, ZCE - justin (AT) koivi (DOT) com
http://koivi.com

"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:08:15 +0100, Stacey
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

Justin like your web design. Just a little error I found in some
spelling as
I skimmed through it. At the bottom where you speak about if someone
wants
to help you misspelled other - you have "outher". Anyway, real nice
layout!

Which browser have you used? IE? And you still like his design?

Looks fine in both IE and FF. I have both on this computer I prefer IE over
FF though. Yes I liked his design I wouldn't lie to him.:-) The colors were
pleasing and the image background was cool. Different strokes for different
folks I suppose. I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Stacey
--
Massage Therapy - http://massage-therapy-101.net
Valentine Gifts-
http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...-day-gifts.htm
Flowers- http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...ts-flowers.htm

On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, Stacey
<Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

Justin like your web design. Just a little error I found in some
spelling as
I skimmed through it. At the bottom where you speak about if someone
wants
to help you misspelled other - you have "outher". Anyway, real nice
layout!

Which browser have you used? IE? And you still like his design?

Looks fine in both IE and FF. I have both on this computer I prefer IE
over
FF though. Yes I liked his design I wouldn't lie to him.:-) The colors
were
pleasing and the image background was cool. Different strokes for
different
folks I suppose. I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Have you noticed that background behaves differently? Try to scroll
the page down in both browsers.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey"
<Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily
break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does)

Nice colors and design though

plh
Paul


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:32:10 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com>
wrote:

I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily
break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does)

If done correctly it should not. If done to display in IE, it will break.

Perhaps not 100% cases, but that's what I was fighting in December.
I have lost I must admit, as I didn't want to use stupid tricks.

Hopefully nobody uses 800*600 screens these days. 1024 or more
(well, 900 or more) is OK.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...right=pH-scale
http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=pH-ca...=pH-definition

"Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey"
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily
break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does)

Maybe for you but not for me. Looks fine.

Nice colors and design though

Yes.

Stacey
--
Massage Therapy - http://massage-therapy-101.net
Valentine Gifts-
http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...-day-gifts.htm
Flowers- http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...ts-flowers.htm

"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote

On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, Stacey
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

Justin like your web design. Just a little error I found in some
spelling as
I skimmed through it. At the bottom where you speak about if someone
wants
to help you misspelled other - you have "outher". Anyway, real nice
layout!

Which browser have you used? IE? And you still like his design?

Looks fine in both IE and FF. I have both on this computer I prefer IE
over
FF though. Yes I liked his design I wouldn't lie to him.:-) The colors
were
pleasing and the image background was cool. Different strokes for
different
folks I suppose. I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Have you noticed that background behaves differently? Try to scroll
the page down in both browsers.

LOL! No, I haven't and still it doesn't for me. I don't see it. Both
browsers look fine and fine during resize. I honestly do not see what you
see.

Stacey
--
Massage Therapy - http://massage-therapy-101.net
Valentine Gifts-
http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...-day-gifts.htm
Flowers- http://allgiftshop.net/occasion-gift...ts-flowers.htm

"Borek" <m.borkowski (AT) delete (DOT) chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote

On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:32:10 +0100, Paul <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com
wrote:

I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily
break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does)

If done correctly it should not. If done to display in IE, it will break.

Well, I have to disagree. I have been making up some new sites that are
fluid in both IE and FF. They are also look so similar you can't tell the
difference between the two.

Perhaps not 100% cases, but that's what I was fighting in December.
I have lost I must admit, as I didn't want to use stupid tricks.

No tricks, and it works good. Especially the one I am working on now. I
really like the way it is looking

Hopefully nobody uses 800*600 screens these days. 1024 or more
(well, 900 or more) is OK.

Nope, not me large flat screen. Love it and won't go back to small!

Stacey

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:30:54 +0100, "Stacey"
<Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

"Paul" <webmaster (AT) houstoncrafts (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:5varr1lamthi9faa1s5m4ibivejbnsm2l6 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:10:44 +0100, "Stacey"
Remove-the-Y-stacey (AT) staceyssimplestuff (DOT) com> wrote:

I prefer designs that fill the screen and adjusts
accordingly.

Yes, but the drawback with a css fluid design is that is can easily
break when the screen size is reduced. (which this one also does)

Maybe for you but not for me. Looks fine.

Well, I am on 1024 768 and if I open "favorites" so it reduces the
size of the page, then look at the right panel (Web Developer Help
section) you will see the problem.

Nice colors and design though

Yes.

Stacey

plh
Paul


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----